Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I gotta say it.


motocross_cat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Same reason they have workouts.

But the most successful coaches and personnel people invariably tell you that game tape is far more valuable.

Giving too much credence to The Combine is how you draft guys like Mike Mamula.

Ok.  To me, with my eyes our defense is going very well considering how terrible our offense is.  We continue to just give the ball back over and over. And they like today are keeping Tom freaking Brady to mostly field goals.  Thats what I see Mr. Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, motocross_cat said:

Ok.  To me, with my eyes our defense is going very well considering how terrible our offense is.  We continue to just give the ball back over and over. And they like today are keeping Tom freaking Brady to mostly field goals.  Thats what I see Mr. Scott.

The offense is bad, but it's way too early in the half to blame anything on fatigue.

The reality is we built a defense primarily geared to stop the pass and in the process formed a unit not only highly susceptible to the run, but also not terribly effective against elite passers. Losing some of our better players to injury and other things didn't help.

Bottom Line: They're just not really that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The offense is bad, but it's way too early in the half to blame anything on fatigue.

The reality is we built a defense primarily geared to stop the pass and in the process formed a unit not only highly susceptible to the run, but also not terribly effective against elite passers. Losing some of our better players to injury and other things didn't help.

Bottom Line: They're just not really that good.

I dont think its fatigue i think its law of averages.  The more the opposing teams has the ball in a game the more chances they have to score.  We give opposition the ball at an alarming rate.

 

Its ok tho.  We can agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

I dont think its fatigue i think its law of averages.  The more the opposing teams has the ball in a game the more chances they have to score.  We give opposition the ball at an alarming rate.

 

Its ok tho.  We can agree to disagree.

A big part of the reason they "have more chances" is that we can't get them off the field on third down.

Giving up an eleven yard first down run to a forty-plus year old quarterback doesn't exactly say good things either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
    • Sounds like Veesaar is entering the draft. He could always test the waters and pull out and return but without him our big men look like a serious liability. Better do something in the portal. If they don't do something about this portal madness my days as a college sports fan are probably numbered. This bullshit of having a nearly entirely new team every season is gonna get old fast.
×
×
  • Create New...