Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I have more Faith in Scott Fitterer than Rhule.


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Toomers said:

If it took two, how much do you think it would cost to keep him for that second year? Being that he had to have had an average year , at best, if you need another year to decide. Sure wouldn’t  be 19M. As I’ve said since April, this was the most illogical cap related move I can remember any team making.  

All they really did was guarantee if there was a year 2, it would be here. Like I said, the trade was a mistake before it even happened. The evaluation process, the bidding process, the desperation, all of it. This was a decision based on faith in Rhule's ability to develop Darnold and that faith was misplaced. I am following their logic, but I'm not saying their logic was ever correct. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

All they really did was guarantee if there was a year 2, it would be here. Like I said, the trade was a mistake before it even happened. The evaluation process, the bidding process, the desperation, all of it. This was a decision based on faith in Rhule's ability to develop Darnold and that faith was misplaced. I am following their logic, but I'm not saying their logic was ever correct. 

And as I’ve pointed out since before they did it, there was no logic applied to any of it. No matter how he performed. If this was their logic, none of them should ever work in a NFL front office again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...