Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are your thoughts of the "going all in" approach that the Rams took?

Sean Payton's Vicodin

By Sean Payton's Vicodin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PantherNation123 Community Regular

PantherNation123

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, unicar15 said:

I think swinging for a QB is a good move (especially this year with our draft options). But Tepper is about to get a serious dose of reality when star QBs give his coach the stiff arm. 

This already happened with us trying to get Stafford last year lmao.  Now that Rhule has further proven his incompetence, no one will want to come here until he’s gone.  You really want to come here with a poo head coach, poo o-line, Robby Anderson as your #2, no real TE’s and an oft-injured CMac??  Nah, no one wants to come to this literal dumpster fire of an org with Rhule at helm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ichigo1057 Experienced

ichigo1057

Posted
Posted

Honestly, I want to reach the point where this team is considered a consistent playoff team with valid chances to go deep into them or to win it all. Going "All In", yeah, it can definitely help to buy you a championship (combined with a little luck of course) but it generally doesn't lead to being there consistently. That being said, I can't really say I could really fault teams on doing it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • electro's horse
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By electro's horse · Posted

      I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...