Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malik


Panfan35
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now after the  Seattle trade, Seattle is being mocked Malik at 9 I would be ok drafting him at 6 here’s why

Hi character Guy and if he runs the 40 in the time everyone thinks being a 4.38-4.41 A cannon for an arm with Accuracy thrives in throwing on the run and he’s very football smart and a born leader being a inch smaller than Watson I would much rather gamble on Malik than trading three years of draft capital. Thoughts 

Edited by Panfan35
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Panfan35 said:

Now after the  Seattle trade, Seattle is being mocked Malik at 9 I would be ok drafting him at 6 here’s why

Hi character Guy and if he runs the 40 in the time everyone thinks being a 4.38-4.41 A cannon for an arm with Accuracy thrives in throwing on the run and he’s very football smart and a born leader being a inch smaller than Watson I would much rather gamble on Malik than trading three years of draft capital. Thoughts 

Willis over Deshawn Watson all day long.  At worst you only lose 1 first round draft pick.  And maybe Willis eventually plays well ??

But the smart & safe move for this team is to take an LT at #6. This is a strong class and the LT position has been one of need on the Panthers for years.    

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t understand why we are so determined to not draft a QB. Teddy, Stafford, Sam, Watson these things rarely work out and require a lot of assets to make it work (for the good ones). Let your scouts do their job and draft one, if he busts try it again in a few years. If we did this last year and drafted Fields we wouldn’t be missing picks and have money tied up in Darnold…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...