Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Team has won the Super Bowl in 20+ years with their QB taking up more than 12.6% of the salary cap


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

That’s a great comeback and yet it isn’t. Not a hard article to read. Hard to feel confident about the writing when they say the line in bolded italics:

Where Do Matthew Stafford & Joe Burrow Stand?

This year’s final two QBs certainly fall in line with the trends, as Matthew Stafford’s $20M cap figure in LA represents 10.96% of the league cap, while Joe Burrow’s 2nd year figure calculcates to just 4.51%. If Burrow were to win the Super Bowl, the median figure for winning QBs since 2011 will drop to 8.8%, falling underthe median for losing QBs (which would increase to 9.07%).

And also mention how much the Rams spent on QBs in 2021. I mean your stats are useless when Stafford’s numbers this year take no account of the Rams basically trading cap space for Goff and Stafford. It’s easy to fit Stafford under their threshold without counting his bonus money that’s eaten by Detroit and Goff’s eaten money doesn’t count either.

It’s a goofy number because it’s easy to push off cap space till later years and teams that are contenders are likely to push out QB cap space because it’s typically the largest contract on the team. It’s like the Saints pushing out Brees’ cap hits so they could sign more people to compete.

You're right, it isn't hard to read, but if you actually read it, you'd know that they address the Stafford Goff thing at the end of the article:

Quote

BUT WAIT

We spent so much time this year discussing the Carson Wentz situation & how he left a $33M dent on the Eagles' salary cap this year, but we've glossed over how the Ram's have not only been in a similar situation - but with far bigger numbers.

If we include ALL QB cap hits for 2021 (active, reserve list, practice squad, & dead cap), the Rams hold the most Quarterback cap in the NFL by a wide margin. In fact, the $46.2M allocated to Rams' QBs in 2021 is the 2nd most of all-time, behind the 2020 Colts. ($56.5M), who were still reeling from Andrew Luck's retirement, a careless Jacoby Brissett extension, & a cup of coffee for Philip Rivers

This of course was written before the super bowl and the Rams went on to be the first team in 20+ years to win it with 25% of their cap allocated to the QB position.

They also have probably the second best defensive player of all time on their defense, OPOTY in Cooper Kupp, and a top 5 head coach/football mind in the NFL.

We have Matt Rhule.

The Rams, we ain't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Love Cam on and off the field. He did so much for the Charlotte community and had zero off field issues. I could care less how the man dresses. He uses fashion to express himself, which is fine by me. 

Exactly, brother.

I don't care if he wears a goddam corset and a fugging tu-tu, he's my fugging QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Watson's Cap hit % next season = 19.4%

The prorated portion of Watson's contract doesn't come with him.  I have no idea why the Texans were choosing to eat $17M as a roster bonus in 2023.  Convert that to a signing bonus and you are under the threshold for 2023 and 2024 and most likely 2025.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

The prorated portion of Watson's contract doesn't come with him.  I have no idea why the Texans were choosing to eat $17M as a roster bonus in 2023.  Convert that to a signing bonus and you are under the threshold for 2023 and 2024 and most likely 2025.

If that is true, then that would put us in a much better position next year and moving forward. 

Will still be difficult missing picks in the first few rounds. Really interested to see everything we have to give up to get him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...