Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rich Eisen on Pelissero's QB piece


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/22/2022 at 8:56 PM, Mr. Scot said:

 

Some guys are way bigger gambles than others.

There's no quarterback in this draft I'm willing to gamble on.

Fair but I just feel like it’s a deeper draft at OT than it is at QB and I’d rather punch my lottery ticket on one then look for a LT later in the draft especially with Campens proven ability to turn late round Ol into high quality players. We all have our preferences though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CashNewton22 said:

Fair but I just feel like it’s a deeper draft at OT than it is at QB and I’d rather punch my lottery ticket on one then look for a LT later in the draft especially with Campens proven ability to turn late round Ol into high quality players. We all have our preferences though.

The risk with that approach is you could end up with two mediocre players when you could have had at least one great one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The risk with that approach is you could end up with two mediocre players when you could have had at least one great one.

Once again there’s no guarantee that he’ll be great just because it’s a oline taken earlier. He could be just as mediocre and I think it’s harder to find good QBs than it is to find good Ol so I’m ok with taking a swing early. We don’t know that icky or Neal or cross will be great just like we don’t know if Willis or corral or Pickett will be awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By no means am I sold on Dave and Dan but Morgan played NFL football at a high level and knows what he is looking at. I firmly believe Tepper anchored these guys with Bryce and told them they had to try to fix him before moving on. Dan has made enough decent moves to convince me he understands how to build a team.
    • The Purdy contract was incredibly dumb but at the same time he was being an effective game manager and they were winning games. I understand the fear of moving on from that. I think it was dumb and incredibly limited their future potential but it's a far cry from the Bryce situation where it's pretty obvious we have one of the worst starters in the league.
    • I think the ideal situation for both parties would be for the team to let Bryce know that they will not be picking up the 5th year option. Then you tell him that a viable QB (via the draft, trade, or FA) will be brought in with the intent of him becoming the starter next season...unless Bryce clearly outperforms them in in camp and in the exhibition season. Then Bryce, as you said in your post, would feel insulted and asked to be traded. Hopefully, we'd have an interested party and who'd be willing to give us a day 3 pick that we can turn into a depth piece or a viable O-lineman (most starting centers and guards in the NFL are Day 3 selections).  Problem solved. He'd no longer be on the roster to cause any tension and be able to get  fresh start elsewhere.  If you can't find a trade partner, and he's ok with the back up role that would be fine. if he isn't willing to remain on the roster as a backup then you release him.
×
×
  • Create New...