Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby or Robbie Anderson no show OTA’s

slumdogmillionaire
 Share

Recommended Posts

iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mwa78 said:

Moore also had 93 receptions compared to 53 for Robbie.

 

1 minute ago, slumdogmillionaire said:

Not even all about the drops.  His routes and everything sucked.   He had 53 catches on 110 targets and 519 yards…..while making 15 million.   His stats were the worse of his career.  

 

Oh damm. I never should have stated a stat that wasn't anti Robbie. Duck and Cover. Duck and Cover.

 

People call out his drops. I show he didn't even lead his own team. Huddle melts down. Yup, just another day.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Welp, this is going to be a fun thread. Full of negativity, snark, and out and out lies. As the Huddle tries to out Huddle each other. 

 

Let the games begin. I'll go. Robbies' hands are so bad. Even All State won't insure them. Bada bing.

yea and you were touting our oline as going to be one of the best we’ve ever had this time last year

we get it, facts don’t affect your optimism because it’s always better to have hope

but this isn’t some ailment diagnosis, it’s just sports, and we will call it for what it is

5 minutes ago, mwa78 said:

Moore also had 93 receptions compared to 53 for Robbie.

a fact you’d think most people look at when doing more than just looking at a ‘drop number’ - which puts Robby as the NFL leader and it’s not even close

with the receptions by the only other three above Anderson in the NFL he’d come out to about 13-14 drops, demolishing #1 which is 9

unless you of course are super optimist and say he would caught every single of those 50 more receptions, he’ll might have even scored 50 TDs

in which case he’s actually underpaid and the best wr in franchise history

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, onmyown said:

yea and you were touting our oline as going to be one of the best we’ve ever had this time last year

we get it, facts don’t affect your optimism because it’s always better to have hope

but this isn’t some ailment diagnosis, it’s just sports, and we will call it for what it is

a fact you’d think most people look at when doing more than just looking at a ‘drop number’ - which puts Robby as the NFL leader and it’s not even close

with the receptions by the only other three above Anderson in the NFL he’d come out to about 13-14 drops, demolishing #1 which is 9

unless you of course are super optimist and say he would caught every single of those 50 more receptions, he’ll might have even scored 50 TDs

in which case he’s actually underpaid and the best wr in franchise history

 

 

lol Robbie didn't lead the league in drops. Quit making crap up.

 

And not one person thought that Oline was going to solve anything. Again. Quit making things up.

 

If you have to make crap up...

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

lol Robbie didn't lead the league in drops. Quite making crap up.

he led the league in dropped passes per reception that’s a fact, and that is exactly what I posted, how is this making things up?

you say no no no it was DJ who dropped more! 

but he only dropped one, single pass more with almost twice the receptions

seems to me you’re the one trying to make crap up lol

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, onmyown said:

yea and you were touting our oline as going to be one of the best we’ve ever had this time last year

we get it, facts don’t affect your optimism because it’s always better to have hope

but this isn’t some ailment diagnosis, it’s just sports, and we will call it for what it is

a fact you’d think most people look at when doing more than just looking at a ‘drop number’ - which puts Robby as the NFL leader and it’s not even close

with the receptions by the only other three above Anderson in the NFL he’d come out to about 13-14 drops, demolishing #1 which is 9

unless you of course are super optimist and say he would caught every single of those 50 more receptions, he’ll might have even scored 50 TDs

in which case he’s actually underpaid and the best wr in franchise history

 

 

Spin City. I like that show.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
Just now, onmyown said:

he led the league in dropped passes per reception that’s a fact, and that is exactly what I posted, how is this making things up?

you say no no no it was DJ who dropped more! 

but he only dropped one, single pass more with almost twice the receptions

seems to me you’re the one trying to make crap up lol

 

No you didn't. You posted that Robbie lead the league in drops. Which is patently false. NOW you want to quantify yourself with this drop %. lol

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

lol 

It's silly to dunk on one receiver just to cover for the struggles of another. The common thread wears #14. Improve the most important position on the roster and most of this will be forgotten. Pretty basic stuff.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

No you didn't. You posted that Robbie lead the league in drops. Which is patently false. NOW you want to quantify yourself with this drop %. lol

Drop percent is what I was referring to. I also assumed that’s what people refer to when they call him the drop leader. That is the only way to quantify dropped passes.

But you insist a player who has 1000 receptions and 10 drops is somehow the leader over a player with 100 receptions and 7 drops. That is literally spinning things.

Who in the hell just looks at just the drop number without the receptions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, onmyown said:

Drop percent is what I was referring to. I also assumed that’s what people refer to when they call him the drop leader. That is the only way to quantify dropped passes.

But you insist a player who has 1000 receptions and 10 drops is somehow the leader over a player with 100 receptions and 7 drops. That is literally spinning things.

Who in the hell just looks at just the drop number without the receptions?

 

Walk in back some more. There is a difference between Drops, and Drop %. If you get confused. Google is your friend.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
Just now, iamhubby1 said:

All I did was respond to Mr. @onmyown posting a stat that was factually wrong. And the Robbie hating crowd jumped in like they were offended. lol You gotta love this place.

it’s no biggie, we will just have to agree to disagree that receptions mean anything when discussion drops, i personally don’t understand looking at it like that - but it’s all good each their own

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Captain Morgan
      T-Mac or Nalo

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • TheSpecialJuan
      Ex-Panthers great Steve Smith sued under 'homewrecker law' for alleged affair.

      By TheSpecialJuan · Posted

      The great Steve Smith 
    • Seltzer
      Travis Hunter on T-Mac

      By Seltzer · Posted

      T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...