Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Talking Panthers Playoffs Chances


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, poundaway said:

Let me clarify, they were 19th in pressure percentage.  The Browns were 27th in sacks last year with 49 sacks across all QB's.  We were 28th with 52 sacks across all QB's.

In any event, I didn't watch Browns games.  But the stats don't seem to jive with the PFF rating.

Yeah no way you can put the Browns in the category of the Rams/Bucs/Chiefs/etc who were all deep playoff teams. All 31 or less sacks. Packers and 49ers 33 sacks. Seahawks had 46 and people bash their O-line as one of the main reasons Wilson left

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah no way you can put the Browns in the category of the Rams/Bucs/Chiefs/etc who were all deep playoff teams. All 31 or less sacks. Packers and 49ers 33 sacks. Seahawks had 46 and people bash their O-line as one of the main reasons Wilson left

Yeah it doesn't add up.  Elite lines don't give up 50 sacks with a below average pressure% and 5th shortest pocket time at 2.3 seconds.    They were better than we were last year, but not elite.

I don't care what the pff score is for the line.  I don't want my QB getting sacked 50 times with only 2.3 seconds to throw.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

If Sam doesn’t throw an Int to Slay, we beat Philly, if he doesn’t throw it right to a Vikings cb, we beat Minnesota, if he doesn’t turn it over for that pick 6 against New England, well…we might have won.

This roster even with Matt Rhule at the helm can get you to 8-9 which will probably get you playoffs in a weak NFC.

Yup.  Baker also had 8 more touchdowns.  How many games did we lose by a score?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...