Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person's Interview with Rhule


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 8/11/2022 at 4:51 PM, Jackie Lee said:

Year..4? Already stretching out that timeline to win. 

Also the Baker section is basically the opposite of how they talked about and handled Sam last year. Hopefully that was a lesson learned but we'll have to wait and see how any of this preseason fluff stuff remains after a few regular season games

I caught that too.........look i put with him and all the haters of his. Disagree with tampper and rhule thinking he has 4,5,6, or my god 7 years..... He needs to show *something* this year or I become one of the "fat rhule" posters....

Bare min is challenging (*late season*) playoff spot. 10 is the magic number. 10 L fire his ass, 10 wins stay for one more year....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2022 at 2:07 PM, raleigh-panther said:

I care about wins on Sunday 

His being a nice guy, what does it matter?  

he isn’t being paid to be a nice guy. 

he is being paid mightily to be a NFL level coach.  

is he?   No

can he be?  Anything is possible   Probability Odds aren’t in his favor 

no offense meant to you in at all, and the reason for the disdain from many on this board, is at some point, he becomes a time waste to fans who spend money to see this team and to players with performance based contracts

his new coaching staff should help. Campen is the real deal on that Oline

but seeing  Rhule looking clueless on the sidelines on Sundays won’t change.

His ego won’t let it

just like thinking he could ‘coach up Darnold’ and his other pablum  

I hate matt rhule I just thought the joke was funny lmao

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...