Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers called about Mims...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

But that was why Gilmore wasn't worth it. We went 2-6 when he was here and we lost to Tampa anyway. It was ultimately pointless. 

True, he and Cam could not save the season.

You have to factor in at the timing of the trade, yes the out-come was poor. But at the time, panthers just lost 1st rounder JC horn and looking playoffs. Plus if Gilmore landed on the bucs, he could have pushed them into a long playoff run. Minor but screw any success for the yucs. Totally understand the move and agreed when it happened. The result was not good and Fineserrererere could have got a comp pick out of him too. 

Plus *not talking about Sam*. Many of these trades are for 6th and 7th rounder........ Panthers just lost a late 7th due to depth. No issues thus far, but if 3s 4s 5s start getting tossed around with poor results.......I'll channel my mr.11 bitach mode. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

True, he and Cam could not save the season.

You have to factor in at the timing of the trade, yes the out-come was poor. But at the time, panthers just lost 1st rounder JC horn and looking playoffs. Plus if Gilmore landed on the bucs, he could have pushed them into a long playoff run. Minor but screw any success for the yucs. Totally understand the move and agreed when it happened. The result was not good and Fineserrererere could have got a comp pick out of him too. 

Plus *not talking about Sam*. Many of these trades are for 6th and 7th rounder........ Panthers just lost a late 7th due to depth. No issues thus far, but if 3s 4s 5s start getting tossed around with poor results.......I'll channel my mr.11 bitach mode. 

Yeah, the failures are largely for lower round picks but this can easily go the other way. If Henderson doesn't pan out and Baker only sticks around for a year with modest team success, now we are looking at a scenario where almost none of Fitterer's trades have been very successful.

The same argument could easily be used for Daley or Little. It isn't like we got a windfall. In Little's case we turned a 2nd rounder into a 7th. So those aren't exactly home runs, other than the fact that none of us even believed it was possible to get that out of them.

So that's why I don't fall in mine with the "Fitterer is a genius with trades" crowd. I don't see a genius yet. I see some definite potential to be a very shrewd guy, pending some players panning out. But I also see that he could just be a guy appearing to doing a lot and accomplishing very little.

Time will tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, the failures are largely for lower round picks but this can easily go the other way. If Henderson doesn't pan out and Baker only sticks around for a year with modest team success, now we are looking at a scenario where almost none of Fitterer's trades have been very successful.

The same argument could easily be used for Daley or Little. It isn't like we got a windfall. In Little's case we turned a 2nd rounder into a 7th. So those aren't exactly home runs, other than the fact that none of us even believed it was possible to get that out of them.

So that's why I don't fall in mine with the "Fitterer is a genius with trades" crowd. I don't see a genius yet. I see some definite potential to be a very shrewd guy, pending some players panning out. But I also see that he could just be a guy appearing to doing a lot and accomplishing very little.

Time will tell. 

Far as little and daley, shocked he got ANY picks/player for either. SHOCKED. 

 

I think hes putting a big effort into adding team talent. No GM is going to win 10 trades in row. Hes also going for low-cost high reward type of trades, thats what I like my GM to do. I do not think hes a genius, but very simply hes not either gettlegut or Smarty "gave me a" Herniay. Thus by default, he is WINNING..... Rhule is not the only one that needs a good showing this year, finesser does need some good results too *form all the trades/draft picks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Far as little and daley, shocked he got ANY picks/player for either. SHOCKED. 

 

I think hes putting a big effort into adding team talent. No GM is going to win 10 trades in row. Hes also going for low-cost high reward type of trades, thats what I like my GM to do. I do not think hes a genius, but very simply hes not either gettlegut or Smarty "gave me a" Herniay. Thus by default, he is WINNING..... Rhule is not the only one that needs a good showing this year, finesser does need some good results too *form all the trades/draft picks. 

Yeah but we also might just have our bar set too low.

TBD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...