Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That is all!


Wundrbread33
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TheCasillas said:

i dont think i stated how many snaps that McCall got. Him and Roy are third stringers behind Brown, Matt L, and Henry Anderson. Just seems like a silly statemetn to say that McCall wont get snaps when he was on the field during pivotal plays. 

Because even on the depth chart McCall is behind Roy… so common sense would tell you that if Roy is healthy then no, you won’t see McCall more (like your post stated). Stating that McCall got a couple reps in the first half does nothing to further your argument when in reality, the majority of his reps came in the second half.

Don’t get upset with me, get upset with the head coach who has his favorites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Because even on the depth chart McCall is behind Roy… so common sense would tell you that if Roy is healthy then no, you won’t see McCall more (like your post stated). Stating that McCall got a couple reps in the first half does nothing to further your argument when in reality, the majority of his reps came in the second half.

Don’t get upset with me, get upset with the head coach who has his favorites.

You are reading the context of my messages incorrectly if you think there is any emotion in my messaging. I am simply stating that your comment about McCall not getting snaps bc of Roy, was not validated based on what we saw today. We can check snap counts tomorrow when they are released. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

You are reading the context of my messages incorrectly if you think there is any emotion in my messaging. I am simply stating that your comment about McCall not getting snaps bc of Roy, was not validated based on what we saw today. We can check snap counts tomorrow when they are released. 

If I’m misinterpreting then my apologies, like you, I would like to see more of McCall. However, Rhule has not shown the tendency to deviate when it comes to player management. I think in order for McCall to see a larger role, Roy would have to be out long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

If I’m misinterpreting then my apologies, like you, I would like to see more of McCall. However, Rhule has not shown the tendency to deviate when it comes to player management. I think in order for McCall to see a larger role, Roy would have to be out long term.

understood, yeah totally man no worries. Always rough getting on here after a loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...