Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where the CMC choice routes that made Darnold look good?


restNChrist
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

That offense last year with cmc healthy for the first 3-4 games was humming.  This offense with cmc healthy is shitt sandwich. 

Against 3 shitty teams who  2 ended up with a worst record.. Yes let's keep acting like those 3 games were a revelation..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Wait wait wait..

No adjustments ever in 20+ games.. Do you ppl not remember??

Oline not good?? Why keep calling 7 and 5 step drop plays?? Do you not remember??

How about 3 games he called the same play 7x and it didn't work the 1st 6.. Do you ppl not remember..

How about the 5 games where it looked like the defense was running our WR routes..  Honest at 1st I blamed Darnold for bad decisions and throwing kill balls.. But it happened to every QB who played.. Db's around every pass play?? Defense calling out our route scheme when we lined up.. That's not QB that's the play designer/caller.. Brady was such a genius the NFl figured him out in 7 games... Do ppl not remember this??

personal can make or break how good a coordinator looks. yes he wasnt perfect  not saying brady was a ogfensive mastermind. but his plays look much more creative that this crap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

personal can make or break how good a coordinator looks. yes he wasnt perfect  not saying brady was a ogfensive mastermind. but his plays look much more creative that this crap. 

It did the 1st 7 games.. But after that no it didn’t.. And some OC with weak personal find away.. Atlanta personal is crap but they are scoring points under Arthur Smith..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

It did the 1st 7 games.. But after that no it didn’t.. And some OC with weak personal find away.. Atlanta personal is crap but they are scoring points under Arthur Smith..

i dunno they have some very versatile chess peices. mariota might not be the best but he can move and extend plays. patterson as well. Pitts is a freak..  drake london looks legit as well... they have weapons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

i dunno they have some very versatile chess peices. mariota might not be the best but he can move and extend plays. patterson as well. Pitts is a freak..  drake london looks legit as well... they have weapons.

Their Oline is meh and lets be real Patterson wasn’t a chess piece anywhere else.. So Smith should get credit for that.. 

And they still have less weapons then Brady had to be real..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Lmao.. ppl seriously don't remember last year at all..

 

22 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Lmao.. ppl seriously don't remember last year at all..

I think Brady had more creativity in the route tree and spacing for our key players. The problem last year was Brady called the same plays over and over. That became predictable. Hopefully Macadoo has more rabbits in his magic hat. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...