Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Keep all recievers bring in NONE


Lumps

Recommended Posts

This is what Delhomme has done, set us back. How can the panther's possibly evaluate gametime playmakers/talents with a QB like Delhomme? Guess who the only QB the defense scrimmages in full pads before game time? Jake Delhomme. Think they have it bad for not being able to get prepared? Just think about our receivers! I think a lot of our receiver's got flat out robbed this year and more than deserve another year.

So to all those who say get rid of Smith, Jarett, Rosario, ETC and bring in a nice WR or even bring in another great besides smith, I say wait it out, there is no reason to do so. We have a 2nd rounder already with experience who just hasn't had a QB. None of these guys have! Not to mention, they have all ran great routes and gotten open only to be Delhommed over and over.

I say spend the cap money any where else BUT receivers and keep the same team. My, what kind of talent we will begin to uncover with a new QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that I don't want another star receiver to brought in with Smith but I would rather spend the money and get an extra fancy QB in here. With a great QB, you really don't need star receivers, instead they all just need to be utilized. That is how successful teams are built today, there is only one (if that) star reciever but everyone is utilized (saints, vikings, colts). Don't stack a team, instead get a head mastermind and greatness will follow. Its proven. And with our running backs, it'd be unstoppable.

As I said really, it's all about putting next years money where it needs to go. Drafting a nice WR to work on is ok...for Moose, cause drafting is relatively cheap, but like I said after watching panthers QBs for so many years I want the real deal, but it will cost a price. It's all about the money...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that I don't want another star receiver to brought in with Smith but I would rather spend the money and get an extra fancy QB in here. With a great QB, you really don't need star receivers, instead they all just need to be utilized. That is how successful teams are built today, there is one star but everyone is utilized (saints, vikings, colts). Don't stack a team, instead get a head mastermind and greatness will follow. Its proven. And with our running backs, it'd be unstoppable.

As I said really, it's all about putting next years money where it needs to go. Drafting a nice WR to work on is ok...for Moose, cause drafting is relatively cheap, but like I said after watching panthers QBs for so many years I want the real deal, but it will cost a price. It's all about the money...

yeah you dont need a star #2 but we do need at least a capable #2..Something we dont have.Moose is too old and Jarrett is two slow to be anything more than a #3..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're crazy if you dont think we at least need an upgrade over Moose. He's too old. We have lacked a true #2 receiver for years. Jarrett has proven that he's not capable of that role. They definitely need to bring in more receivers or at least a capable #2. I think we are set at TE though.

Remember Ricky Proehl! Moose could have the same role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delhomme has nothing to do with seperation..

I understand your point but these guys (even Smith) are clearly not playing with any emotion and Jake's the reason. Why bust you ass every play knowing the ball will be poorly thrown if thrown at all.

I bet before the year is done we will see a difference even if Moore is just somewhat better. The guys will at least try harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that Moore is starting every receiver will have a 100 yard day, Smith will catch 10 balls and we will know that all the receiver's faults were on Delhomme.

More realistic scenario. We run the ball all day and give Moore safe short passes until he gains some confidence. Then we decide whether to loosen up the reigns. In any case we will ease him into the situation so that the receivers won't look any better under moore than Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...