Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ADAM SCHEFTER: Panthers listening to Christian McCaffrey trade offers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

His takes are all troll coated. You are a rational poster so I'll tend to agree albeit with the sentiment that I don't think he's lost any ability.

 

Frankcompletely won't answer me on how his cap hit is "crippling us" yet won't acknowledge he's advocating to add to a ridiculous dead cap #.

I think its the dead cap and if traded anytime this year, it would all hit at once. something like 27 million. 

Current Contract

Christian McCaffrey signed a 4 year, $64,063,500 contract with the Carolina Panthers, including a $21,500,000 signing bonus, $38,162,500 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $16,015,875. In 2022, McCaffrey will earn a base salary of $1,035,000, a restructure bonus of $7,365,000 and a workout bonus of $200,000, while carrying a cap hit of $8,785,750 and a dead cap value of $27,138,000.

CONTRACT TERMS:4 yr(s) / $64,063,500 SIGNING BONUS$21,500,000 AVERAGE SALARY$16,015,875 GTD AT SIGN:$30,062,500 TOTAL GTD:$38,162,500 FREE AGENT:2026 / UFA
  BONUS BREAKDOWN CAP DETAILS CASH DETAILS  
YEAR   AGE BASE SALARY SIGNING WORKOUT RESTRUCTURE CAP HIT DEAD CAP YEARLY CASH
2020 Contract details by year 24 $825,000 $6,969,782 - - $7,794,782 $32,732,282 $22,337,274($22,337,274)  
2021 Contract details by year 25 $990,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $1,409,500 $6,899,500  $33,537,500 $8,237,500($30,574,774)  
2022 Contract details by year 26 $1,035,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $3,250,750 $8,785,750 $27,138,000 $8,600,000($39,174,774)

POTENTIAL OUT: 2023, 3 YR, $39,174,774; $18,352,250 DEAD CAP

2023 Contract details by year 27 $11,800,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $3,250,750 $19,550,750 $18,352,250 $12,000,000($51,174,774)
2024 Contract details by year 28 $11,800,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $3,250,750 $19,550,750 $10,801,500 $12,000,000($63,174,774)
2025 Contract details by year 29 $12,000,000 - $200,000 $3,250,750 $15,450,750 $3,250,750 $12,200,000($75,374,774)

 

2nd column form the right is dead money, it hurts. Plus I know each yr the panthers have kicked money down the road, I dont know if sportac kept up with those details.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Do you know a GM personally? Pretty intersting that you can state that so certainly. If you know someone then by all means do share.

 

At the end of the day teams are trading contracts, and the dollar amount of those contracts are how franchise measure gaining value. Teams are not in the business to pay for other team's contracts.

I need to know one or multiple GM's personally to conclude that most of them will recognize that they can simply walk away from the table if we demand more than a 3rd or 4th round pick given everyone knows our contractual circumstances and the circumstances with the question of his availability given his recent run of injuries? Okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

I think its the dead cap and if traded anytime this year, it would all hit at once. something like 27 million. 

Current Contract

Christian McCaffrey signed a 4 year, $64,063,500 contract with the Carolina Panthers, including a $21,500,000 signing bonus, $38,162,500 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $16,015,875. In 2022, McCaffrey will earn a base salary of $1,035,000, a restructure bonus of $7,365,000 and a workout bonus of $200,000, while carrying a cap hit of $8,785,750 and a dead cap value of $27,138,000.

CONTRACT TERMS:4 yr(s) / $64,063,500 SIGNING BONUS$21,500,000 AVERAGE SALARY$16,015,875 GTD AT SIGN:$30,062,500 TOTAL GTD:$38,162,500 FREE AGENT:2026 / UFA
  BONUS BREAKDOWN CAP DETAILS CASH DETAILS  
YEAR   AGE BASE SALARY SIGNING WORKOUT RESTRUCTURE CAP HIT DEAD CAP YEARLY CASH
2020 Contract details by year 24 $825,000 $6,969,782 - - $7,794,782 $32,732,282 $22,337,274($22,337,274)  
2021 Contract details by year 25 $990,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $1,409,500 $6,899,500  $33,537,500 $8,237,500($30,574,774)  
2022 Contract details by year 26 $1,035,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $3,250,750 $8,785,750 $27,138,000 $8,600,000($39,174,774)

POTENTIAL OUT: 2023, 3 YR, $39,174,774; $18,352,250 DEAD CAP

2023 Contract details by year 27 $11,800,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $3,250,750 $19,550,750 $18,352,250 $12,000,000($51,174,774)
2024 Contract details by year 28 $11,800,000 $4,300,000 $200,000 $3,250,750 $19,550,750 $10,801,500 $12,000,000($63,174,774)
2025 Contract details by year 29 $12,000,000 - $200,000 $3,250,750 $15,450,750 $3,250,750 $12,200,000($75,374,774)

 

2nd column form the right is dead money, it hurts. Plus I know each yr the panthers have kicked money down the road, I dont know if sportac kept up with those details.

This is what they don't understand it's essentially the same as cutting him the already paid bonus money hits immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I don't think you understand how this works...The dead cap on a trade is nearly identical to being cut....

 

Just like being cut his remaining bonus money will count immediately instead of being pro rated.

We are aware. The key to that within this current discussion is absorbing the dead cap hit that is coming one way or another with or without an additional draft pick to ease our minds and give us something anything to build on after wasting an 8th overall pick and the most expensive RB contract in the NFL. But again we do not hold much leverage if you want to continue to argue that there is nothing more we can discuss because it is fantasy.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

I need to know one or multiple GM's personally to conclude that most of them will recognize that they can simply walk away from the table if we demand more than a 3rd or 4th round pick given everyone knows our contractual circumstances and the circumstances with the question of his availability given his recent run of injuries? Okay.

Did I read the report wrong? Did it say the Panthers are calling other teams to trade him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

This is what they don't understand it's essentially the same as cutting him the already paid bonus money hits immediately.

It does, that issue should not be debated. Unless theres some new rule/loop hole about dividing up the hit ala post june 1st cut. The trade would be very complex for both parties. Panthers need lube for all the bonus money and are there teams that still view CMC as "elite" *and* want to offer a "elite" trade package? I dont see it, imo CMC will remain a panther. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

We are aware. The key to that within this current discussion is absorbing the dead cap hit that is coming one way or another with or without an additional draft pick to ease our minds and give us something anything to build on after wasting an 8th overall pick and the most expensive RB contract in the NFL. But again we do not hold much leverage if you want to continue to argue that there is nothing more we can discuss because it is fantasy.

Dead cap hit either way? lol They aren't cutting him. Wasted? By what definition this team has no SB wins every draft pick in franchise history is technically a waste by your ludicrous definitions.

 

You keep acting like your peace of mind means anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

It does, that issue should not be debated. Unless theres some new rule/loop hole about dividing up the hit ala post june 1st cut. The trade would be very complex for both parties. Panthers need lube for all the bonus money and are there teams that still view CMC as "elite" *and* want to offer a "elite" trade package? I dont see it, imo CMC will remain a panther. 

If the Panthers were deathly afraid of the dead money McCaffrey wouldn't be available for trade. They know it's coming sooner or later it was a bad deal all along it is what it is.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

If the Panthers were deathly afraid of the dead money McCaffrey wouldn't be available for trade. They know it's coming sooner or later it was a bad deal all along it is what it is.

I believe GM Scott is just gathering information on CMCs league wide value and RBs in general. Adding this information to the cut option as well. Hes smart about having a "open door" policy about taking any/all trade calls. I had a boss with a similar deal about allowing any vendor in the door, it can benefit everyone if youre smart.....but it also opens your options and market too.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

If the Panthers were deathly afraid of the dead money McCaffrey wouldn't be available for trade. They know it's coming sooner or later it was a bad deal all along it is what it is.

Clearly seeing as they essentially have 100m in dead cap over three seasons... A winning strategy! 

 

None of what's going on lines up with your dumb ass opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Clearly seeing as they essentially have 100m in dead cap over three seasons... A winning strategy! 

 

None of what's going on lines up with your dumb ass opinion.

You're clearly angry and too emotional over this conversation you're welcome to stop quoting posts that hurt your feelings bud.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I believe GM Scott is just gathering information on CMCs league wide value and RBs in general. Adding this information to the cut option as well. Hes smart about having a "open door" policy about taking any/all trade calls. I had a boss with a similar deal about allowing any vendor in the door, it can benefit everyone if youre smart.....but it also opens your options and market too.  

I'd have to differ a bit on this IMO this is much more than just due diligence. We are going to shed some of these bad deals one way or another and he's probably been directed to do so by Tepper. That's not a good thing but given how hands on our owner has been it's likely the case. Hopefully things don't get too ugly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'd have to differ a bit on this IMO this is much more than just due diligence. We are going to shed some of these bad deals one way or another and he's probably been directed to do so by Tepper. That's not a good thing but given how hands on our owner has been it's likely the case. Hopefully things don't get too ugly.

Bro, if you trade CMC aka your best weapon, thats a harder sale to gain a good HC. You got to factor that in too, lots of stuff to factor in this shitshow...

I think scott will not just make one move either, he will line a few moves with agreed terms and if one happens the others will too. Honestly us fans overrate players, I still think thats the biggest issue. League is not impressed with 2 seasons IR current meh stats CMC, 9 sack best season Burns, Robbie lols, DJ "scared of TDs" moore, etc etc..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...