Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offers for Burns


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Burns is a fuggin beast…best young pass rusher in the game.  Finding another player like this dude is like finding The Loch Ness Monster

Are you Nuys.

Watt Garrett Young Both Bossas Crosby Parsons Highsmith chubb hell even old ass Von Miller and numerous others I would take over Burns in a second

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

Man open your eyes…he is better than all dem dudes

You're crazy.

Let's do vs Kevin Greene

By this point in his career he was averaging 16 sacks a season

Let's do LT

At this point he was in the teens with a 20.5 sack season in his 6th year and he was a full time LB.

Wanna check Reggie White?

First 4 seasons 13,18,21,18 with 16 game seasons.

All of these guys where getting it from the beginning. 

How many you need me to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Top 10 in sacks over the past 3 years that doesn’t even include pressures which can be just as good sometimes. 

Pressures are not as good.

We have lost more than one game at the end where he failed to bring the QB down leading to either a TD pass or big first down.

If I remember correctly and I probably don't even to Baker last year or two years ago.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You're crazy.

Let's do vs Kevin Greene

By this point in his career he was averaging 16 sacks a season

Let's do LT

At this point he was in the teens with a 20.5 sack season in his 6th year and he was a full time LB.

Wanna check Reggie White?

First 4 seasons 13,18,21,18 with 16 game seasons.

All of these guys where getting it from the beginning. 

How many you need me to do?

Name a non Hall of Famer.  LOL

So Brian isn’t Hall of Fame level yet.  Agreed weirdo he is 24 yrs old

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

Name a non Hall of Famer.  LOL

So Brian isn’t Hall of Fame level yet.  Agreed weirdo 

He will never be.

He's Mike Rucker. A solid player. That's it period. 

He's not good much less elite.

15 is where good starts.

17.5 to 18 is where elite starts 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Are you Nuys.

Watt Garrett Young Both Bossas Crosby Parsons Highsmith chubb hell even old ass Von Miller and numerous others I would take over Burns in a second

Von Miller is at the end of his career. He is still great, but taking him over a top 10 24 year old isn’t a good idea. Burns has more sacks than Crosby in equal number of games. Thank God you aren’t running a team.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/who-has-the-most-sacks-the-last-3-seasons
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Von Miller is at the end of his career. He is still great, but taking him over a top 10 24 year old isn’t a good idea. Burns has more sacks than Crosby in equal number of games. Thank God you aren’t running a team.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/who-has-the-most-sacks-the-last-3-seasons
 

Yes but Crosby can play the run and wasn't a 1st rd pick.

You guys way overvalue the guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...