Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore will start Sunday's game


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Hope they can get some pratice outside..

Matt Moore will start Sunday's game against the Bucs, according to ESPN's Adam Schefter.

This is the worst kept secret in football. Jake Delhomme is dealing with a broken middle finger on his throwing hand and may have been benched anyway, but coach John Fox was trying to maintain a "competitive advantage" by keeping his starter a secret. Moore is worth an add in two-QB leagues but we don't expect him to be much of an upgrade over Delhomme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think fox will let him?

Panthers WR Muhsin Muhammad said that Matt Moore has a "knack (for) throwing the deep ball."

Moore has only made three career starts and none since 2007, so it will be interesting to see if he can jumpstart the Panthers' passing game. We doubt he'll be able to help Steve Smith and the rest of the receivers too much, but it can't get much worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think fox will let him?

yep.....I think he will give him a tiny more room than in 07....and he let him throw in 07. I think the real offense will come showup this week....Smitty has been beating guys for some homeruns this year.....I think we see one Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...Moore with a knack for throwing the deep ball at least is an improvement over Jake. Jake throws pick-6s because the defender only has to run a short distance to their goalline. This might give our offense more time to tackle the interceptor....if that's what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...Moore with a knack for throwing the deep ball at least is an improvement over Jake. Jake throws pick-6s because the defender only has to run a short distance to their goalline. This might give our offense more time to tackle the interceptor....if that's what happens.

well, Moore might throw a good deep ball.....but if they continue to run this deep vertical routes to Moose it won't matter how good the throw is.....Moose can't run it and they always go to it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care so much about him completing deep passes as I do the line getting out there and busting their "ever loving" ass to protect him.

It's going to cause everyone to start with the "I told you so" bullshit if Matt is on his back all day, and can't get the job done, and all the while, Fox will once again come out smelling like rose panties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care so much about him completing deep passes as I do the line getting out there and busting their "ever loving" ass to protect him.

It's going to cause everyone to start with the "I told you so" bullshit if Matt is on his back all day, and can't get the job done, and all the while, Fox will once again come out smelling like rose panties.

well, the QB can bring that on himself and end it to some small degree......Jake couldn't throw the ball and teams wanted toss up balls. Plus, Moore is more mobile.....the OL hasn't been great...but Jake had a role in all of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care so much about him completing deep passes as I do the line getting out there and busting their "ever loving" ass to protect him.

It's going to cause everyone to start with the "I told you so" bullshit if Matt is on his back all day, and can't get the job done, and all the while, Fox will once again come out smelling like rose panties.

The good thing about moore is that he can run.The bad thing is thats not the type of QB fox likes.lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...