Panthers favoring Levis?

[heel31ok]

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Having seen many of your past football observations, I'd say not having your trust is probably a good sign.

If you were all in on him, then I'd be worried.

No you wouldnt.lol.

[heel31ok]

Funny thing is I have rarely been wrong.That isnt the pt though, is it ? Not agreeing with the braintrust is the pt.

 

[Mr. Scot]

8 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Funny thing is I have rarely been wrong.That isnt the pt though, is it ? Not agreeing with the braintrust is the pt.

You're generally only wrong when you offer opinions

[jayboogieman]

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

He isn’t my top choice, but there is definitely potential there similar to Richardson. 

If you're choosing between the two because of potential, I'd have to go with Richardson because of age. He has less wear and injuries than Levis.

[heel31ok]

2 hours ago, stan786 said:

Sure, but you don't ignore good process just because a coach is new. If the head coach likes a QB and the team needs a QB you go get the QB as that's the most important position in the sport.

Being new means trust hasnt been earned.Im not ignoring good process , I am stating what   I consider the good process.

[heel31ok]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

You're generally only wrong when you offer opinions

Proven by your offering a wrong opinion.sure.

Whats else you got ?

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, heel31ok said:

Proven by your offering a wrong opinion.sure.

Whats else you got ?

Better things to do than talk with a dimbulb...

[heel31ok]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Better things to do than talk with a dimbulb...

lol...the slink away of shame

[Mr. Scot]

3 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

lol...the slink away of shame

Nah

I've seen enough of your prior posts on here to know you're not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, but you think you are.

Let's just say I'm not that bored.

[heel31ok]

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nah

I've seen enough of your prior posts on here to know you're not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, but you think you are.

Let's just say I'm not that bored.

Lol...still here ?

[heel31ok]

The sin of disagreeing with the braintrust. 

[ForJimmy]

53 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

If you're choosing between the two because of potential, I'd have to go with Richardson because of age. He has less wear and injuries than Levis.

Yeah I think Richardson has the higher ceiling and is younger. I’d probably prefer him as well.

[kungfoodude]

9 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I think Richardson has the higher ceiling and is younger. I’d probably prefer him as well.

I do think those are two of the most irrelevant factors that fans value highly. 

It matters how you play the position and how capable you are of playing the position. In that regard, both Levis and Richardson seem to be severely lacking. Physical abilities through the roof but incredibly minute intangibles.

[ForJimmy]

31 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I do think those are two of the most irrelevant factors that fans value highly. 

It matters how you play the position and how capable you are of playing the position. In that regard, both Levis and Richardson seem to be severely lacking. Physical abilities through the roof but incredibly minute intangibles.

I get that but between the two, if you are gambling anyway, might as well gamble for the higher return.