Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford/Carr Comparison


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yeah give me the QB in the draft if he is a bust then oh well.

 

Carr is taking this team nowhere. He had weapons in Las Vegas and still couldn't win.

 

You think with lesser weapons he's taking this team anywhere?

That's literally Stanford's story before he went on to win the SB. Sometimes, these QBs just play for bad coaches. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csx said:

I thought I typed not on level. I certainly meant to

I thought it could have been a typo but figured it was still worth putting the info out there to back up the rebuttal to this desperate thread. Hey I want to be a contender again too but some fans here on the huddle are developing a condition where they perceive any QB who might give them the time of day to be the next sure thing. Did the same thing with Darnold the same thing with Mayfield and now again with a much older and only slightly more consistent QB coming off one of his worst statistical seasons with one of the best receivers in the league. What could go wrong 😏

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Stafford is the only QB.

 

Name me more. You just naming a QB who got traded to a loaded roster who won.

 

We don't have the Rams roster dude. Carr should go to the 49ers if he wants to be Stafford.

 

You act like we loaded. Carr ain't taking us very far.

Peyton Manning. 

Stafford passed for nearly 5000 yards that season. Surrounded by talent or not, that's impressive. But couldn't you make the same argument regarding Stroud and Young? Both were on loaded rosters filled with 4* & 5* recruits. How isn't that the same?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So you putting Carr in the same league as Manning?

 

Cmon man just stop. You can't compare him to Stafford because the situation would be totally different. Rams were the favorites the moment they traded for Stafford.

 

We wouldn't be the favorites signing Carr. Our roster just isn't as great as that Rams roster was.

I wasn't comparing Manning to Stafford. You asked for another name, I gave you another name. Agree to disagree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

@Xtreme

My guy. He played in 15 games and had a 60.8 completion % with Davante Adams compared to Darnold the bust who had 58.6% through 6 games. And he's several years older than Sam. This is who you want to pay 35 million dollars a year?

Bad coaching. Very similar to how Mayfield went on to actually play decent after being picked up by the Rams. 35 million is a bit high, but I would rather drop 35 million on Carr than drop multiple 1st round picks to get a QB that was surrounded by insane talent. And if he ends up being a bust, that will set us back for YEARS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bad coaching?

My man he's been in the league for 9 years.

 

You want to pay 35 mil for a 32 year old QB who needs good coaching to be successful?

 

That has disaster written all over it. If the QB needs a good coach we might as well go the cheaper route and draft and develop one.

And during those 9-years, he had three different head coaches. So, yes, bad coaching. Just like Stafford. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

What I don't understand is if this guy is as great as everyone is saying why has there only been 2 teams that have shown interest?

 

He's the best available QB and can be had right now but seems like teams still waiting on the actual legit QB's Rodgers and Lamar to make a move.

There will be more than 2 teams interested - it's still very early, I think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...