Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023 Charlotte FC Game Thread


MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Yup. Even though their Twitter account tonight showed our traditional approach. We were def running a 4-4-2.

Seemed to kind of shift between a 4-2-3-1 and 4-4-2, but yeah not the 4-3-3 the team puts out in lineups. Either way, Bronico and Jones in a double pivot should be the move, which is what it looked like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand, Westwood is back so that’s exciting. On the other, Jones is starting at CB.

Starting XI

GK - George Marks

LB - Harrison Afful

LCB - Derrick Jones

RCB - Adilson Malanda

RB - Nathan Byrne

CDM - Ashley Westwood

LCM - Brant Bronico

RCM - Karol Swiderski

LW - Kerwin Vargas

ST - Enzo Copetti

RW - McKinze Gaines

SUBS - Kahlina, Lindsey, Diop, Sobocinski, Hegardt, Agyemang, Cambridge, Privett, Meram

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

On one hand, Westwood is back so that’s exciting. On the other, Jones is starting at CB.

Starting XI

GK - George Marks

LB - Harrison Afful

LCB - Derrick Jones

RCB - Adilson Malanda

RB - Nathan Byrne

CDM - Ashley Westwood

LCM - Brant Bronico

RCM - Karol Swiderski

LW - Kerwin Vargas

ST - Enzo Copetti

RW - McKinze Gaines

SUBS - Kahlina, Lindsey, Diop, Sobocinski, Hegardt, Agyemang, Cambridge, Privett, Meram

Bender as a sub? Whats up with that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Guess he’s joined Mello in the dog house. And Shinyashiki and Santos aren’t even in the dog house, they got kicked to the homeless shelter.

Latt has lost me when it comes to lineup management.  Jozwiak being out tonight is the perfect reason to play bender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...