Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Grohl is just good people


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Zaximus said:

I mean a lot of grunge copied Neil Yong's 80's stuff too, it's all good.

Pearl Jam's Ten was such an amazing record that they didn't feel they could fit Yellow Ledbetter on it which is like a B side from that album and now a staple at concerts (and a lot of people's favorites).  They are still making good records.  Pearl Jam smartly has evolved over the years.  They couldn't make albums like Ten or Vs forever, as they got older they changed and their fans and they didn't try to recreate the early albums at all.  Not many bands would do that.   Some of their later career stuff has some of my favorites, especially Avacado album for instance.  

I love that era of music though, easily my favorite.  Nirvana may be one my least favorites honestly.  I personally don't like them as much as PJ, AIC, STP, Soundgarden, Blind Melon, etc.  PJ's Ten, STP's Purple, Soundgarden's Superunknown are some of the best front to back rock albums ever.  And AIC's Unplugged album is one of the best live albums, easily.   I also think Nirvana's unplugged is great too.  

Agreed with all of this, except I loved Nirvana. I honestly wasn't a big fan of Nevermind. It just felt way overproduced to the point that it was no longer Nirvana. It was what a marketing machine would want Nirvana to be. Bleach and In Utero were their best studio albums and both From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah and Unplugged were GREAT live albums capturing the two extremes that they were capable of.

And yeah, Blind Melon was fuging awesome. "Change" is one of my favorite '90s songs, period. Nirvana, Soundgarden, Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and Alice in Chains were clearly the cream of the crop of the grunge era, but STP honestly wasn't far behind and may have closed the gap even more had Weiland not gone drug riddled insane and tried to transform himself into David Bowie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

Nirvana ripped off the pixies. I think Kurt even said that in an interview.

The quiet verse/loud chorus dynamic definitely.  "Come as You Are" was also basically a rework of the main riff in Killing Joke's "Eighties".  poo I think Cobain has even said that the main riff in "Smells Like Teen Spirit" was just a re-interpretation of "More Than a Feeling".

When they exploded it was like lightning striking.  It was the right producer, the right climate in popular music, the right image, everything.  Perhaps most important, to keep things on track with this topic, was Grohl replacing Chad Channing.  Channing is a competent drummer but Dave Grohl is punk John Bonham.   It's no contest.

Consider a song like "In Bloom"; there was a version of it they had done for Sub Pop and it doesn't sound dissimilar from anything else that was on "Bleach".  Butch Vig got his hands on it with Dave Grohl playing drums and adding vocal harmonies and suddenly it's this anthemic wall of sound monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed with all of this, except I loved Nirvana. I honestly wasn't a big fan of Nevermind. It just felt way overproduced to the point that it was no longer Nirvana. It was what a marketing machine would want Nirvana to be. Bleach and In Utero were their best studio albums and both From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah and Unplugged were GREAT live albums capturing the two extremes that they were capable of.

Fun fact: according to Steve Albini, most of the vocals on "In Utero" were recorded in one sitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed with all of this, except I loved Nirvana. I honestly wasn't a big fan of Nevermind. It just felt way overproduced to the point that it was no longer Nirvana. It was what a marketing machine would want Nirvana to be. Bleach and In Utero were their best studio albums and both From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah and Unplugged were GREAT live albums capturing the two extremes that they were capable of.

And yeah, Blind Melon was fuging awesome. "Change" is one of my favorite '90s songs, period. Nirvana, Soundgarden, Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and Alice in Chains were clearly the cream of the crop of the grunge era, but STP honestly wasn't far behind and may have closed the gap even more had Weiland not gone drug riddled insane and tried to transform himself into David Bowie.

Yeah Weiland was pretty unique in his vocal ability and the band musically has always been really really good.  I can't believe we lost so many from that era, unique voices.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

The quiet verse/loud chorus dynamic definitely.  "Come as You Are" was also basically a rework of the main riff in Killing Joke's "Eighties".  poo I think Cobain has even said that the main riff in "Smells Like Teen Spirit" was just a re-interpretation of "More Than a Feeling".

When they exploded it was like lightning striking.  It was the right producer, the right climate in popular music, the right image, everything.  Perhaps most important, to keep things on track with this topic, was Grohl replacing Chad Channing.  Channing is a competent drummer but Dave Grohl is punk John Bonham.   It's no contest.

Consider a song like "In Bloom"; there was a version of it they had done for Sub Pop and it doesn't sound dissimilar from anything else that was on "Bleach".  Butch Vig got his hands on it with Dave Grohl playing drums and adding vocal harmonies and suddenly it's this anthemic wall of sound monster.

yeah. grohl is super talented. dont get me wrong i like nirvana i just never understood the hype as like one of the greatest bands of all time. kurt definitely had a cool detached anti authority vibe going on that spoke to a lot of people during that time period. i also didnt know until recently that kurt was working for the melvins and was actually fired as a producer lol. melvins dont get enough love. those early 90s albums they put out were incredible. i saw them live right before covid hit for my bday and they still got it. they played queen off stoner witch and the place went absolutely bonkers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Yeah Weiland was pretty unique in his vocal ability and the band musically has always been really really good.  I can't believe we lost so many from that era, unique voices.  

If the history of modern music has one big, screaming message it is "don't fug with heroin, just don't do it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

Yeah...

Not everyone is as lucky as Nikki Sixx

There are so many heroin casualties.  I've known people who've kicked and they still struggle to not give in and get high in a moment of weakness.

I've had my vices and over-indulged in some stuff for sure, but when I've noticed it starting to fug my life up I've managed to straighten out (so far, at least).  Heroin seems like a different beast entirely.  I've seen completely normal workaday Joes turned into burnt out husks of people by that poo.  Supposedly fentanyl is even worse and that's horrifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big pharma companies pushing the hell out of opioids and lying about their addictiveness has made the heroin problem so much worse. Fentanyl is just the heroin dealers stretching their product but with something as ridiculously potent as fentanyl getting your mix off just slightly means people dying left and right. But dong worry, the FDA keeps approving increasingly potent options because their big pharma handlers ensure them it'll all be okay.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...