Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Grohl is just good people


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Zaximus said:

I mean a lot of grunge copied Neil Yong's 80's stuff too, it's all good.

Pearl Jam's Ten was such an amazing record that they didn't feel they could fit Yellow Ledbetter on it which is like a B side from that album and now a staple at concerts (and a lot of people's favorites).  They are still making good records.  Pearl Jam smartly has evolved over the years.  They couldn't make albums like Ten or Vs forever, as they got older they changed and their fans and they didn't try to recreate the early albums at all.  Not many bands would do that.   Some of their later career stuff has some of my favorites, especially Avacado album for instance.  

I love that era of music though, easily my favorite.  Nirvana may be one my least favorites honestly.  I personally don't like them as much as PJ, AIC, STP, Soundgarden, Blind Melon, etc.  PJ's Ten, STP's Purple, Soundgarden's Superunknown are some of the best front to back rock albums ever.  And AIC's Unplugged album is one of the best live albums, easily.   I also think Nirvana's unplugged is great too.  

Agreed with all of this, except I loved Nirvana. I honestly wasn't a big fan of Nevermind. It just felt way overproduced to the point that it was no longer Nirvana. It was what a marketing machine would want Nirvana to be. Bleach and In Utero were their best studio albums and both From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah and Unplugged were GREAT live albums capturing the two extremes that they were capable of.

And yeah, Blind Melon was fuging awesome. "Change" is one of my favorite '90s songs, period. Nirvana, Soundgarden, Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and Alice in Chains were clearly the cream of the crop of the grunge era, but STP honestly wasn't far behind and may have closed the gap even more had Weiland not gone drug riddled insane and tried to transform himself into David Bowie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

Nirvana ripped off the pixies. I think Kurt even said that in an interview.

The quiet verse/loud chorus dynamic definitely.  "Come as You Are" was also basically a rework of the main riff in Killing Joke's "Eighties".  poo I think Cobain has even said that the main riff in "Smells Like Teen Spirit" was just a re-interpretation of "More Than a Feeling".

When they exploded it was like lightning striking.  It was the right producer, the right climate in popular music, the right image, everything.  Perhaps most important, to keep things on track with this topic, was Grohl replacing Chad Channing.  Channing is a competent drummer but Dave Grohl is punk John Bonham.   It's no contest.

Consider a song like "In Bloom"; there was a version of it they had done for Sub Pop and it doesn't sound dissimilar from anything else that was on "Bleach".  Butch Vig got his hands on it with Dave Grohl playing drums and adding vocal harmonies and suddenly it's this anthemic wall of sound monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed with all of this, except I loved Nirvana. I honestly wasn't a big fan of Nevermind. It just felt way overproduced to the point that it was no longer Nirvana. It was what a marketing machine would want Nirvana to be. Bleach and In Utero were their best studio albums and both From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah and Unplugged were GREAT live albums capturing the two extremes that they were capable of.

Fun fact: according to Steve Albini, most of the vocals on "In Utero" were recorded in one sitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed with all of this, except I loved Nirvana. I honestly wasn't a big fan of Nevermind. It just felt way overproduced to the point that it was no longer Nirvana. It was what a marketing machine would want Nirvana to be. Bleach and In Utero were their best studio albums and both From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah and Unplugged were GREAT live albums capturing the two extremes that they were capable of.

And yeah, Blind Melon was fuging awesome. "Change" is one of my favorite '90s songs, period. Nirvana, Soundgarden, Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and Alice in Chains were clearly the cream of the crop of the grunge era, but STP honestly wasn't far behind and may have closed the gap even more had Weiland not gone drug riddled insane and tried to transform himself into David Bowie.

Yeah Weiland was pretty unique in his vocal ability and the band musically has always been really really good.  I can't believe we lost so many from that era, unique voices.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

The quiet verse/loud chorus dynamic definitely.  "Come as You Are" was also basically a rework of the main riff in Killing Joke's "Eighties".  poo I think Cobain has even said that the main riff in "Smells Like Teen Spirit" was just a re-interpretation of "More Than a Feeling".

When they exploded it was like lightning striking.  It was the right producer, the right climate in popular music, the right image, everything.  Perhaps most important, to keep things on track with this topic, was Grohl replacing Chad Channing.  Channing is a competent drummer but Dave Grohl is punk John Bonham.   It's no contest.

Consider a song like "In Bloom"; there was a version of it they had done for Sub Pop and it doesn't sound dissimilar from anything else that was on "Bleach".  Butch Vig got his hands on it with Dave Grohl playing drums and adding vocal harmonies and suddenly it's this anthemic wall of sound monster.

yeah. grohl is super talented. dont get me wrong i like nirvana i just never understood the hype as like one of the greatest bands of all time. kurt definitely had a cool detached anti authority vibe going on that spoke to a lot of people during that time period. i also didnt know until recently that kurt was working for the melvins and was actually fired as a producer lol. melvins dont get enough love. those early 90s albums they put out were incredible. i saw them live right before covid hit for my bday and they still got it. they played queen off stoner witch and the place went absolutely bonkers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Yeah Weiland was pretty unique in his vocal ability and the band musically has always been really really good.  I can't believe we lost so many from that era, unique voices.  

If the history of modern music has one big, screaming message it is "don't fug with heroin, just don't do it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

Yeah...

Not everyone is as lucky as Nikki Sixx

There are so many heroin casualties.  I've known people who've kicked and they still struggle to not give in and get high in a moment of weakness.

I've had my vices and over-indulged in some stuff for sure, but when I've noticed it starting to fug my life up I've managed to straighten out (so far, at least).  Heroin seems like a different beast entirely.  I've seen completely normal workaday Joes turned into burnt out husks of people by that poo.  Supposedly fentanyl is even worse and that's horrifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big pharma companies pushing the hell out of opioids and lying about their addictiveness has made the heroin problem so much worse. Fentanyl is just the heroin dealers stretching their product but with something as ridiculously potent as fentanyl getting your mix off just slightly means people dying left and right. But dong worry, the FDA keeps approving increasingly potent options because their big pharma handlers ensure them it'll all be okay.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...