Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everyone saying Moore is not the long term answer..


uncpanther

Recommended Posts

You have to be painfully short sited to make any assesment on Moore at the current time, beyond the fact that he is managing the game better than Jake has this season.

Give him the rest of the season (which the team may, or may not do), and then you'll have something to base it upon. Regardless of how well he may end up playing, I believe the team should still draft another QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to be painfully short sited to make any assesment on Moore at the current time, beyond the fact that he is managing the game better than Jake has this season.

Give him the rest of the season (which the team may, or may not do), and then you'll have something to base it upon. Regardless of how well he may end up playing, I believe the team should still draft another QB.

We should definitely snag a QB in this draft if not two.

All three of our QB's are question marks and that's certainly not the way to win in the NFL.(Jake is more along the lines of flat out done)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore is basically now the old Jake. The old Jake was good enough to win but not actually a great QB per most standards. Moore has enough to get the job done in an offense not built around great QB play. He can make all the throws Jake use to be required to make and as a plus is athletic......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore is basically now the old Jake. The old Jake was good enough to win but not actually a great QB per most standards. Moore has enough to get the job done in an offense not built around great QB play. He can make all the throws Jake use to be required to make and as a plus is athletic......

In today's NFL it's not unrealistic to expect good QB play and good RB play.

Plenty of teams have both.

An offense not built around good QB play is likely a terrible one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...