Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BH's Time Waster: Panthers Analysis & Full 2-Round Mock


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Hoping to make this less just posting mocks my man.  Appreciate the responses though 

Sorry just a couple of examples on different simulations where I’ve been able to get by trading down in the 2nd.. Continue..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the giant TE out of Georgia in the second? If we are going to have a smaller QB maybe we could give him a Godzilla sized target? If he keeps his weight down and is aggressive he could be an unstoppable force in the red zone. If he were to catch onto the pro game fast we could have both he and Hurst as viable receiving options which could cut down on the need for a WR. Just thoughts as I think it would be interesting to pair the largest TE in the league with the smallest QB. never know, it could work out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say, the Falcons scenario in my mock is one I hope doesn't happen. This gives them Bijan, Downs, & K White.  They could put themselves in really nice position if someone wants to move up for Levis or AR (if they are available) at 8.  

Obvious candidates being HOU, TEN, & TB.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

How about the giant TE out of Georgia in the second? If we are going to have a smaller QB maybe we could give him a Godzilla sized target? If he keeps his weight down and is aggressive he could be an unstoppable force in the red zone. If he were to catch onto the pro game fast we could have both he and Hurst as viable receiving options which could cut down on the need for a WR. Just thoughts as I think it would be interesting to pair the largest TE in the league with the smallest QB. never know, it could work out!

I would have no problem with that if I didn't project him to Dallas at 26 in Round 1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RenoCarolina said:

I just get the feeling that Hooker is moving ahead of Levis.

 

Also I'm sure you did a lot of research on that DET trade back but it sure doesn't look like they gave up enough to move up 11 spots.  I would be miffed.

I will say, I see Hooker fitting with a lot more teams than Levis right now so it could very well happen.  

Overall, even if there is some hesitation with Levis, I see ~TB/19 to MIN/24 is his floor for dropping.  Hooker could end up as high as the teens (to the Texans?) so Hooker could possibly go before. That being said, there's A LOT of rumors this time of year. 

I will say, anyone who saw that Bama-TEN game & watched Hooker progress year by year from his sophomore season at VT to last year at TEN should know what he's capable of.  Age be damned, if he can play, he can play.  He has great downfield placement, got the legs, size, even if the arm isn't Levis-level, he's got game.

My biggest BS meter goes off w/ the idea multiple QBs go in a row at the top.  This is not a class that goes 1-3.   

Fits:

Young - Panthers=as good as done

Stroud - Colts, Raiders

Richardson - Seahawks, Raiders, Vikings (Just don't see the Texans or Titans swinging for him)

Hooker - Raiders, Texans, Rams, Tampa Bay

Levis - Titans, Tampa Bay

my 2 cents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RenoCarolina said:

Also I'm sure you did a lot of research on that DET trade back but it sure doesn't look like they gave up enough to move up 11 spots.  I would be miffed.

Re: this comment 

I did check some stuff out and historic trades.  

It's s 9 spot move from 39 to 48. 

But where we gain is moving up 12 in the next round from 93 to 81 and them adding on a 5th to sweeten.

I think we could squeeze a 4th, but that'd give them a big gap mid-draft, so could be a 39+93 for 48+81 swap, and they add on a future/24' 3rd (highest I could see)   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An added prospect fit that could happen per some reports/buzz:

Tucker Kraft & Sam LaPorta TE - Bengals, R2

They've hosted both and apparently are very high on them, potentially have their sights on them instead of Kincaid or Mayer at 28.  I don't think they need to force anything with their position in R1.  R1--I could see Gibbs (as mocked), DB, OL, or even DL if a rusher presents himself. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In 2025 Sam Darnold had over 1k more passing yards than Bryce Young on 1 less pass attempt. Repeat that to yourself several times and let it sink in. I absolutely love it when people come on here and invoke Sam Darnold like some gotcha. Darnold is the physical prototype for what anyone needs in a franchise QB. All the physical tools. Few people thought he would put it all together on the mental side of the position. He used to make some of the worst decisions you would ever see. At times in the past he made up for that with absurd throws and athleticism. But make no mistake whatsoever no matter how you feel about our starting QB. Bryce Young is a completely opposite conundrum. He lacks virtually any and all physical tools and athleticism and his elite processing is really mediocre at best on a good day and horrific on a bad day. These are realities people should have already been addressing instead of quadrupling down in year four.
    • The nice thing about the timing of Bryce's contract at least is that it's going to match up with the 2027 Draft Class. No excuses, he either becomes Rams 2nd half Bryce year long, or we draft his replacement.  Nothing wrong with carrying Bryce on his 5th year expiring and a 1st round rookie waiting in the wings. Let the rookie sit until the trade deadline, deal Bryce to a needy team at the time, profit. 
    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
×
×
  • Create New...