Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Disney Pricing and associated talk


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just got back from a week in Florida for the whole Disney experience with my family.  Oh boy!  My credit card is weeping!  We ended up paying for the Genie lighting lane pass for several rides.  I think we added another $100 or so each day.  It was worth it frankly.  There are so many people at the parks.  It was annoying.  I think I'm just getting less peoply in my old age.

Now the extra cash on top of the tickets was worth it - but we're not going to be hitting Disney again for several years.  Magic Kingdom = overrated.  Hollywood Studios = Star Wars area was cool, but the rest, meh.  Animal Kingdom was by far the coolest!  Just way more chill, less impatient and entitled fuggers.

Next time, we'll hit up Epcot.

We also went back to Universal for Harry Potter again.  We just love going back to that area!  But there is a difference between the quality in Disney and Universal.  It's fun for a bit, but I couldn't do it again for a few more years.  This was a great time as my son is 11, and it was still really exciting and cool for him.

As far as the streaming services versus cable - it's been interesting to see with the WGA-SAG strike how things have changed for the worse for writers and actors.  There was an interesting interview on Pod Save America with Adam Conover (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOSrzEfeftI) that talks about some of the changes that the producers have suggested to keep more money and try to remove the human element as much as possible.  The change in rates and residuals is quite drastic.

There is a real impasse between what the Producers want and the Writers.  I think the producers are going to blink first as people stop watching and paying for their content.  As Adam Conover said in the podcast, they do deliver the A+ quality entertainment that people want.  AI can't replace the human element no matter what the producers want.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2023 at 9:40 AM, d-dave said:

I just got back from a week in Florida for the whole Disney experience with my family.  Oh boy!  My credit card is weeping!  We ended up paying for the Genie lighting lane pass for several rides.  I think we added another $100 or so each day.  It was worth it frankly.  There are so many people at the parks.  It was annoying.  I think I'm just getting less peoply in my old age.

Now the extra cash on top of the tickets was worth it - but we're not going to be hitting Disney again for several years.  Magic Kingdom = overrated.  Hollywood Studios = Star Wars area was cool, but the rest, meh.  Animal Kingdom was by far the coolest!  Just way more chill, less impatient and entitled fuggers.

Next time, we'll hit up Epcot.

We also went back to Universal for Harry Potter again.  We just love going back to that area!  But there is a difference between the quality in Disney and Universal.  It's fun for a bit, but I couldn't do it again for a few more years.  This was a great time as my son is 11, and it was still really exciting and cool for him.

As far as the streaming services versus cable - it's been interesting to see with the WGA-SAG strike how things have changed for the worse for writers and actors.  There was an interesting interview on Pod Save America with Adam Conover (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOSrzEfeftI) that talks about some of the changes that the producers have suggested to keep more money and try to remove the human element as much as possible.  The change in rates and residuals is quite drastic.

There is a real impasse between what the Producers want and the Writers.  I think the producers are going to blink first as people stop watching and paying for their content.  As Adam Conover said in the podcast, they do deliver the A+ quality entertainment that people want.  AI can't replace the human element no matter what the producers want.

 

I love universal. Keep an eye out for the new park opening in a couple years - it will have Mario land (and more Harry Potter) and a few other big brands.  It sounds awesome!  The best thing about universal is if you stay on property you have a fast pass included to all rides but Hagrid's.  It was well worth it!  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2023 at 9:49 AM, pnthrs said:

I love universal. Keep an eye out for the new park opening in a couple years - it will have Mario land (and more Harry Potter) and a few other big brands.  It sounds awesome!  The best thing about universal is if you stay on property you have a fast pass included to all rides but Hagrid's.  It was well worth it!  

 

 

As much as i hate the spirit of fast passes, they were worth every penny when we went. Hell, we ended up staying a night in the resort even though we had a condo elsewhere because it was still cheaper than buying the passes alone.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Orlando and I’m a WDW annual pass holder and I only go specifically because the annual pass essentially pays for itself after 8 or so visits a year.

I completely understand those who visit who aren’t pass holders though. Mickey is taking them out back behind the Country Bears Jamboree shed and fuging them in the ass with the prices.

Most people I’ve talked to are spending around $5000 for a seven day Disney vacation for a group of four people… that’s fuging nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...