Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“Ball Placement Specialist”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm never a fan of using completion percentage as your primary measure of accuracy. They're just too many factors that can skew it one way or another.

I know it's not really possible for a fan to do this on a large scale, but if you want to judge accuracy the best way is just to watch a guy's throwing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm never a fan of using completion percentage as your primary measure of accuracy. They're just too many factors that can skew it one way or another.

I know it's not really possible for a fan to do this on a large scale, but if you want to judge accuracy the best way is just to watch a guy's throwing.

This wasn’t a completion pct

 

its a on target aka ball placement pct.

how often he hit the guy perfectly, catch or dropped

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This wasn’t a completion pct

 

its a on target aka ball placement pct.

how often he hit the guy perfectly, catch or dropped

I would have to assume he knew that Will Levis did not have an 89% completion percentage lol

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This wasn’t a completion pct

its a on target aka ball placement pct.

how often he hit the guy perfectly, catch or dropped

Gotcha. I didn't look that hard at the numbers.

8 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

I would have to assume he knew that Will Levis did not have an 89% completion percentage lol

You're correct...sort of. I wasn't really looking that closely 😃

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • agree to disagree you are entitled to that opinion even though I find the argument completely bizarre based on data. I could type out a long paragraph discussing those areas but what’s the point. I posted a screenshot that showed Bryce in a similar post snap situation with a free rusher in his face which resulted in a TD - that’s what happened on the play so I posted it. 
    • I've already addressed this notion in a previous reply. You are basing your assertion outside reality if you think Bryce would have not only been more successful but defeated the Patriots in place of Herbert. Bryce got blown off the field by that Patriots team with the highest paid OL in the league. We've seen Bryce with an OL that gave up 65 sacks and it resulted in the #1 pick. And that is not a defense of Herbert or arguing he is a great QB in any way. He has physical talent but he has been similar to Darnold early in his career in terms of his very up and down perfomances. However that does not change the fact that they have significantly less invested in the OL than the Panthers.
    • I think Tepper has been setting the stage where pending there is no miracle he wipes it all clean.  Think you already have been told that with small things like Evero staying.  Bryce is the guy next year.  OC, DC, everything stays the same.  QB room largely the same.  Nothing would really matter there.  They basically get one more shot and it goes how the schedule paired with our 27th ranked O predictably most likely goes.  Everyone out the door together.  Bryce is a bridge tier QB.  I don’t see Dave surviving where he could be bridge QB here in reality. 
×
×
  • Create New...