Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ted Kaczynski....the Unabomber dies


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

What a fascinating but terribly tragic story.  First of all, so tragic for his victims.  But also tragic that such a brilliant mind was taken by mental illness.  If not for the tremendous courage and sense of moral duty by his brother, who knows how many more would have been hurt.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The experiments he was subjected to at Harvard are interesting. Gotta wonder what role they may have played in what he ultimately became.

Interestingly enough, my wife's uncle was a geologist and lived in the same small Montana town. He knew Ted. No one really paid him any mind in town. He was just kinda the crazy town hermit that didn't really bother anything so whatever. He pretty much only came into town to go to the library.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly, our society has way too many people wandering the streets these days contending with an untreated mental illness.  Ted was only one of millions.

As LP mentioned, we are all fortunate that Ted's brother put the safety of his fellow citizens ahead of his brother's continued freedom.   Otherwise, chances are good that more innocent lives would have been destroyed.

The following are the latest statistics available from the National Institute of Mental Health Disorders, part of the National Institutes of Health:

  • Mental health disorders account for several of the top causes of disability in established market economies, such as the U.S., worldwide, and include: major depression (also called clinical depression), manic depression (also called bipolar disorder), schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

  • An estimated 26% of Americans ages 18 and older -- about 1 in 4 adults -- suffers from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.

  • Many people suffer from more than one mental disorder at a given time. In particular, depressive illnesses tend to co-occur with substance use and anxiety disorders.

  • Approximately 9.5% of American adults ages 18 and over, will suffer from a depressive illness (major depression, bipolar disorder, or dysthymia) each year.

  • https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/mental-health-disorder-statistics

  • Text HOME to 741741 from anywhere in the United States, anytime. Crisis Text Line is here for any crisis. A live, trained Crisis Counselor receives the text and responds, all from our secure online platform. The volunteer Crisis Counselor will help you move from a hot moment to a cool moment.

  • https://www.crisistextline.org/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ted Kaczynski’s belief in his own sanity went all the way back to his 1996 trial when his lawyers attempted to enter an insanity defense, but he rejected the plea. At one point, Kaczynski requested that he be allowed to represent himself on the grounds that his lawyers thought he was mentally ill.

Although Kaczynski’s case is an extreme example, the reason behind his lack of insight into his illness is actually quite common amongst people with severe mental illness.

Approximately half of all people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder do not realize they are sick - a condition called anosognosia.

Anosognosia, meaning “unawareness of illness,” is a syndrome resulting from anatomical damage to the brain and is the single largest reason behind why some individuals suffering with severe mental illness do not take their prescribed medications. Those affected believe there is nothing wrong with them, even though it is often obvious to those around them.

The brains of people who have and do not have anosognosia are different, which is why some people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder are fully aware of their illness while other people with the conditions are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...