Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The end of profit sharing what that means for the panthers....

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted

i ve been hearing alot about this and how its going to affect the nfl. it looks like it will signal the end of small market teams competing with bigger teams for big namers. it also could mean the end of teams that depend on that cash to make ends meet. the jags,bills,vikings ect. it means that the nfl will become more like baseball. the big name teams dallas,the redskins,the patriots will dominate and compete season in season out for the championship. with that being said how will this affect the panthers. will we be forced to move like the jags..what about when it comes time to build a new stadium..its a new ball game ladies and gents...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

panthers don't benefit from the revenue sharing. they are among the most profitable teams in the NFL.

just because you are small market doesn't' mean you are destitute.

don't worry about it. it just means the panthers get to keep more of what they earn rather than having to share it with the poorer teams.

also there is little to no chance that it will stay that way. when a new CBA is reached and everything else gets hashed out, revenue sharing will start back up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

panthers don't benefit from the revenue sharing. they are among the most profitable teams in the NFL.

just because you are small market doesn't' mean you are destitute.

don't worry about it. it just means the panthers get to keep more of what they earn rather than having to share it with the poorer teams.

also there is little to no chance that it will stay that way. when a new CBA is reached and everything else gets hashed out, revenue sharing will start back up again.

not if Jerry Jones has anything to say about it. and all it will take is one year of no cap and there is no going back. Do you honestly think players will play for cheap(not cheap, but a lot less than what they will be offered during a no-cap era.) after having a taste of a no cap system? Not gonna happen. Say hello to Dallas, Redskins, etc having a roster full of straight up super stars.

Jerry Jones is a fuging asshole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurb Newbie

Kurb

Posted
Posted

not if Jerry Jones has anything to say about it. and all it will take is one year of no cap and there is no going back. Do you honestly think players will play for cheap(not cheap, but a lot less than what they will be offered during a no-cap era.) after having a taste of a no cap system? Not gonna happen. Say hello to Dallas, Redskins, etc having a roster full of straight up super stars.

Jerry Jones is a fucking asshole.

MOST players could end up making less IMO.

Only so many spots on a roster.

Also keep in mind the effects of tags(franchise and others).

Players need the cap just as much as the owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

not if Jerry Jones has anything to say about it. and all it will take is one year of no cap and there is no going back. Do you honestly think players will play for cheap(not cheap, but a lot less than what they will be offered during a no-cap era.) after having a taste of a no cap system? Not gonna happen. Say hello to Dallas, Redskins, etc having a roster full of straight up super stars.

Jerry Jones is a fucking asshole.

jerrah doesn't have as much weight in the league as you think. the last 15 years have been working against him. the league doesn't bend in his favor. the capo will be back and so will revenue sharing.

btw...good job getting around those filters. :rolleyes:

MOST players could end up making less IMO.

Only so many spots on a roster.

Also keep in mind the effects of tags(franchise and others).

Players need the cap just as much as the owners.

this is true. with a cap ceiling there is also a cap floor and teams are forced sometimes to spend more than they would otherwise. the revenue sharing takes away the excuses for them not spending enough.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

jerrah doesn't have as much weight in the league as you think. the last 15 years have been working against him. the league doesn't bend in his favor. the capo will be back and so will revenue sharing.

btw...good job getting around those filters. :rolleyes:

this is true. with a cap ceiling there is also a cap floor and teams are forced sometimes to spend more than they would otherwise. the revenue sharing takes away the excuses for them not spending enough.

I know he doesn't man, but I'm just going by what I've heard. There are several owners who are pushing for no cap. There were some old owners who were standing their ground and pushing it away(aka Wellington Mara, etc) but I honestly can't see it going back to a cap if it's actually removed.

I just don't want the NFL to turn into the MLB :[

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
Posted

.

btw...good job getting around those filters. :rolleyes:

this is true. with a cap ceiling there is also a cap floor and teams are forced sometimes to spend more than they would otherwise. the revenue sharing takes away the excuses for them not spending enough.

He does right now because of that albatross known as the new Cowboys stadium.

The NFL can't afford for Dallas to fall into the abyss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

well, aside from the redskins and cowboys you won't.

i fully expect them to try.

truth is there probably won't be a whole lot of movement going on, at least not compared to the usual. i can see less of the valuable FAs actually hitting the market. i can also see more college players coming out in the draft trying to get in before the rookie scale hits. there may be a few FAs that are just cut from their teams to make way for the young ones but it will be more to do with future contracts and limited roster space.

one thing to remember is that just because there is no cap doesn't mean that contracts all of a sudden disappear. teams that are bound to their teams will still be bound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

With the rules they have in place in case of an uncapped year it is not really going to benefit anybody. With top teams being unable to sign a FA unless they lose a FA of equal or greater value, UFA not begining until the 6 year mark, a total of four tags per team, etc. no one is REALLY going to benefit.

The owners would benefit more than the players but not by a massive margin.

The reason they owners decided to do away with revenue sharing is it backs the NFLPU into a corner. By doing away with revenue sharing they pretty much told them to fug off. The union was probably wanting too much of a profit share and the owners weren't going to take it. By cutting revenue sharing they are forcing thier bluff because now all of the NFL players know that if it becomes uncapped then you are down to about 10-12 teams that will be willing to pay big money for players. It was a smart move by the owners. I wouldn't be suprised to see revenue sharing in the final draft of a new CBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

With the rules they have in place in case of an uncapped year it is not really going to benefit anybody. With top teams being unable to sign a FA unless they lose a FA of equal or greater value, UFA not begining until the 6 year mark, a total of four tags per team, etc. no one is REALLY going to benefit.

The owners would benefit more than the players but not by a massive margin.

The reason they owners decided to do away with revenue sharing is it backs the NFLPU into a corner. By doing away with revenue sharing they pretty much told them to f**k off. The union was probably wanting too much of a profit share and the owners weren't going to take it. By cutting revenue sharing they are forcing thier bluff because now all of the NFL players know that if it becomes uncapped then you are down to about 10-12 teams that will be willing to pay big money for players. It was a smart move by the owners. I wouldn't be suprised to see revenue sharing in the final draft of a new CBA.

good points. have any thoughts on the potential lockout if a new CBA isn't reached?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

panthers don't benefit from the revenue sharing. they are among the most profitable teams in the NFL.

just because you are small market doesn't' mean you are destitute.

don't worry about it. it just means the panthers get to keep more of what they earn rather than having to share it with the poorer teams.

also there is little to no chance that it will stay that way. when a new CBA is reached and everything else gets hashed out, revenue sharing will start back up again.

This..... I really hope we do reach a CBA next year cause I dont want a lockout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jfra78
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By jfra78 · Posted

      6 pages of tuka and Seltzer arguing is actually 97 pages long
    • Seltzer
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Seltzer · Posted

      100%. And these same people will claim you have an agenda. You can't have it every way. We had the lowest rated defense in the league last year. Statistically the worst ever. By PFF grades (for whatever that's worth- but they are readily accepted, used, and conveyed by most "reputable" sources), the defense was the worst ever. Not only that, PFF rated our receiving corp the worst in football last season. The absolute worst... out of 32 teams. Which is why regardless of the lip service Canales and Morgan paid to the current guys, they knew it would be criminal not to give Bryce more help. People fixating on team stats and not taking these things into context are stupid, plain and simple, and I'm for one thankful they're not running this team (or probably anything for that matter bc they obviously can't discern reality. Again, going back to the eyeball test these Narrative Nancies seem to hate so much, did they not see the windows Bryce was putting balls into? Have the generally not watched much NFL? Please, please show me the film where all these NFL QBs are making throws like this to this point Bryce was "below average" down the stretch compared to them. Bryce made more wow throws in that 3 game stretch of the Bucs, Chiefs, and Eagles than every other QB combined in all the years since since Cam got hurt I genuinely am baffled by people that can watch throws like that and act like it's nothing. I guarantee you Steve Spagnola, Todd Bowles, and and Vic Fangio didn't think it was nothing after watching the little guy torch them with players those teams would be embarrassed to trot out at the skill position players. The national media spent all year making excuses for Mahomes not having elite weapons when he had multiple 1st & 2nd round talents at the skill positions along with future HoFers in Kelce and Hopkins. Bryce wasn't throwing for 300 yards every week with David Moore and Adam Theilen in spite of jaw dropping throws and you want to say the guy played below average. For those people, again, we ain't watching the same sport. And the name calling doesn't change that... The vitriol and projection... it's off the effing charts with these people.  
    • frankw
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By frankw · Posted

      "Well you see if you remove this terrible game that terrible game this other terrible game and then focus on these games you'll see he's actually one of the better QB's in the league and he's actually as good as Jayden Daniels". My god this place is delusional. I love it.
×
×
  • Create New...