Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Charlie Weis QBs please...


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Clausen is better than Quinn. But just to ease your nerves, Clausen will most likely go in the Top 15. We couldn't get him anyway.

i wasn't sure, I've seen Clausen, never saw Quinn at ND. I just wonder if hes a system QB. long ball has been in question. but you are right, he wouldnt land to us anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will definitely be in the back of my head whenever I watch him. Clausen can make all the throws though. Coming out of college, I don't feel like Quinn was as gifted as Clausen is. But I am definitely interested to see how he turns out. Quinn just always seemed like a tool to me...if that counts for anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wasn't sure, I've seen Clausen, never saw Quinn at ND. I just wonder if hes a system QB. long ball has been in question. but you are right, he wouldnt land to us anyway.

it's not like he grew up in the spread. The Weis system is the exact same we use. So it's not like he has to learn the WCO after playing the run and shoot, or learn the Coryell O after being a read-option/veer/flexbone QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom Brady is technically a Charlie Weis QB.

good point.

Clausen's the only guy Weis picked. Quinn was picked by someone else. Brady was recruited and picked by someone else.

It's like the difference between Kyle Boller and Aaron Rodgers. Jeff Tedford made Boller look good enough to draft, but he picked Rodgers as his QB and made him into a star. There's definitely a difference between making a senior look good and hand-grooming a guy from start to finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...