Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistic QB draft candidates: Hiller, Skelton and Perrilloux.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

There are a few diamonds in the rough in every draft class. Teams just have to be lucky enough to find the right ones. Here are three NFL prospects at QB that may be available. I have given you a loose, nutshell of a synopsis. Do your own research on them and see what you think. Perhaps a few of you already know a little something about these guys and can add some perspective.

Ryan Perrilloux:

Somewhat of a troubled history, including being sent packing from LSU, but has shown steady improvement on and off the field at Jacksonville State. He has thrown for impressive yardage, is mobile and has the highest passer rating out of any NFL prospect at the moment.

John Skelton:

Fordham's offensive machine has excellent size and strength, and has shined against inferior talent. Great pocket presence and accurate. It is Fordham, however, so there are questions as to whether his success will translate at the pro level.

Tim Hiller:

Has a cannon, good size, and accurate, though there are questions about his short passing game. Can put good touch on the ball. There are questions about whether he can succeed with inferior talent (but to me that's pretty stupid considering he'd be coming to the NFL). If he's still available, he would probably be my pick at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

take it from an LSU fan; Perrilloux is a first class piece of sh it. Why are you focusing on division 1AA talent?

Nothing inherently wrong with division 1AA talent. Just looking at the top QB prospects out of the class. The Golden Calf of Bristol and others will be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys ---- please stop panicking about the draft ..... as it stands now we are giving san fran our pick which will be between 7 and 14.......that means our 2nd round pick will be between 39 and 46......lots of good, good talent will be available.. look at who needs QBs ---- not cleve, tb, det, san fran, chi . or kc so that leaves wash, buff, stl, oak............i think we will still be able to get a QB in round 2.

ha -- maybe somebody will be crazy enough to want peppers and we can pick up a couple extra picks (very doubtful tho')

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys ---- please stop panicking about the draft ..... as it stands now we are giving san fran our pick which will be between 7 and 14.......that means our 2nd round pick will be between 39 and 46......lots of good, good talent will be available.. look at who needs QBs ---- not cleve, tb, det, san fran, chi . or kc so that leaves wash, buff, stl, oak............i think we will still be able to get a QB in round 2.

ha -- maybe somebody will be crazy enough to want peppers and we can pick up a couple extra picks (very doubtful tho')

These guys will be our main competition for a QB.

Bills

Jags

Raiders

Skins

Vikings

Rams

Seahawks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These guys will be our main competition for a QB.

Bills

Jags

Raiders

Skins

Vikings

Rams

Seahawks

I don't really see why the Jags, Skins, Vikings and Seahawks are on this list. The Vikings will more than likely give T-Jax another shot, the Jags have Garrard who has been a more than serviceable starter and have more glaring needs, Jason Campbell is not the Skins problem and the Seahawks have Hasslebeck and have much more glaring needs.

The only way the Jags take a QB is if they get pressured in to taking The Golden Calf of Bristol and the Raiders may not even be looking for a QB if Gradkowski continues to play the way he does.

All that being said, we still won't be drafting a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...