Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen injury


OldhamA
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I’m no doctor but isn’t arthroscope where doctors cut open tissue to look at a joint? Were you mean endoscopic? I feel like that would be a season ender…. But like I said I am no doctor. So disregard if this is all in your wheelhouse 

its not a full surgery where they cut you open and operate which would require a few months to rehab and heal. but basically an arthroscope is when they make a few small incisions (a few cm wide) and place a small camera and other instruments to either clean up scar tissue and/or place sutures. commonly done for the knee and shoulder. cam had it done for his partially torn rotator cuff in his shoulder a few years ago.

my educated guess is that Horn had partial tear in his hamstring where the muscle meets the tendon or the tendon partially ripped off from the bone near the knee. therefore, since its not a full complete tear, they could use arthroscope to suture the partially torn tissue together. recovery time depending on how well Horn progress would be around 6-8 weeks. if everything goes well, he could be back by late Nov. but its Horn we're talking about....

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Does anyone know what it is?

Reich said he's done for the year, but finished the game against Atlanta with the injury. Seems odd. 

When I tore mine, it didn’t hurt that bad after the initial tear. You can actually function ok and without much pain even if you don’t get it reattached, but your range of motion and strength won’t return to normal unless you get the surgery.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I still think another QB is brought in Day 3. Grier is camp body level at this point.
    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
×
×
  • Create New...