Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sign VICK this Offseason!


dmo4455

Recommended Posts

We need Vick on our football team. He will bring a mobile QB which we never had and someone who can throw the long ball. I know that the Panthers organization wants the Clean image but screw it lets win some football games. He might cost some money but if we can afford to pay Pep $1mil a game then we can afford Vick. He is use to the NFC south and would be on a mission with a new chance and a new team. I don't want to hear about Matt Moore being our future after 1 good game. #7 in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work in the medical field at a facility that services people thru out the Charlotte area and thru out NC. Every day, EVERY SINGLE DAY, I talk to patients and donors about the NFL and the Panthers. Every day, EVERY SINGLE DAY, I hear someone saying "the Panthers should sign Vick". Yet I come on this board and people act like its a crazy suggestion. Its a no brainer that we should be looking at acquiring him, but politics and a marketable image reign supreme in Pantherland. You can call us losers, just....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eagles will not keep him next year. So we can either trade or give up some picks. No drugs just sick of seeing crap QB play week after week. If you guys want Moore as your starter then have fun being a Panthers fan next year and for years to come. We need some excitement in that stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...