Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Enjoy more cancelled Flights


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/21/AR2009122101607.html?hpid=sec-business

Have working in the airlines for awhile I will tell you now. This will result in so many cancelled flights it will be turnovered in 5 years. I can agree with making sure passengers have enough food and water and medical equipment. But a 3 hour rule will result in chaos for taxiing airplanes. Enjoy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you are saying, but I think the rare horror story of flights sitting on the tarmac for 12 hours just pissed too many people off.

I'll tell ya I would have lost my mind with 2 kids under age 4 sitting on the ground for more than a couple hours.

And they would drive the whole flight batsh*t crazy too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you are saying, but I think the rare horror story of flights sitting on the tarmac for 12 hours just pissed too many people off.

I'll tell ya I would have lost my mind with 2 kids under age 4 sitting on the ground for more than a couple hours.

And they would drive the whole flight batsh*t crazy too!

12 hours yes but you do get those days when you have Thunderstorms over the airport and snow and sleet days. Think the longest I had was 3:30 but I worked for a charter airline and we could schedule our flights for later or earlier if the weather was bad. Biggest problem is gate space. It is a premium on bad weather days they want you to unload load up and get fuel as quickly as possible. ATC does implement policies to curb traffic into those airports. You get a clearance time and you are not allowed to takeoff til that time. Problem with that is it is as changing I've had a clearance time go from 1 hour delay to 6 hours with a a one hour increase so I received 6 time changes. Makes the airlines look bad and passnegers pissed off.

The thing that needs to be done is improve ATC that is the biggest problem right now. The airway structure is the same since the invention of it. Small tweaks here and there. But they need to do a complete overhaul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the past, the industry has fought government action on tarmac delays in court. In 2008, a federal court struck down a New York passenger bill of rights that called for airlines to provide food, water and restrooms for passengers stuck in grounded aircraft for more than three hours.

It's pretty bad when the government has to enforce decent customer service. Even worse when the industry fights it.

Obviously, there are exceptions like Southwest, but the airlines have gotten bailed out too often and have been too unresponsive to customer needs as a whole for too long.

The airlines basically opened themselves up to this. If they would have cleaned their own houses, this wouldn't have happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have working in the airlines for awhile I will tell you now. This will result in so many cancelled flights it will be turnovered in 5 years. I can agree with making sure passengers have enough food and water and medical equipment. But a 3 hour rule will result in chaos for taxiing airplanes. Enjoy!

That's 2 hours too generous. If you can't get my ass in the air in under an hour, then don't even pull the plane away from the jetway.

Who could have known that extending someone's "flight" by 3 hours in a cramped seat huffing jet fuel fumes wouldn't be pleasurable? Let's see...get to the airport 2hrs early to make sure you get through security, sit in the plane on the ground for 3 more hours, then fly whatever the scheduled duration of the flight is, wait a good 30-45 mins (at best) for your luggage to come out, wait for the rental car shuttle (which more and more seems to be to satellite locations) and hopefully you belong to one of those "grab any car" clubs or you'll be waiting longer on the rental car person to assign you a car. Yeah, boy....air travel is so convenient!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...