Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Team Would Get Back To The Superbowl


Hayden Panettiere

Recommended Posts

There is a good possibility that we could go to the Super Bowl if we had Moore as the starting QB long ago. Unfortunately, Delhomme screwed up any chance we had of getting into the playoffs. Sad too, because I have always liked Delhomme and always will. Just stuck with him too long...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are operating off a HUGE fallacy.

You're assuming that we would be playing this good if we still had the pressure of a possible playoff berth. That would change things entirely.

Actually, if Moore had been starting since the beginning of the season, I think we would already be locked into the playoffs at this point. Just because they supposedly "don't have pressure" doesn't mean we are playing better for that reason.

If anything, I think they would play better if they were competing for the spot because they would have that motivation. Right now, there isn't much to play for other than pride, yet they are still somehow motivated enough to play inspired football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's this little problem that we have...one of our best players just broke his wrist and is out for the season, considering he was our only real receiver I'm guessing we wouldn't have made it very far

Yeah....we have been able to plug in another player all year, but we don't have anybody to replace Superman...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...