Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much compensation would the Panthers get for Moore?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Depending on how much Moore would be offered, if the Panthers did not match that offer these are the draft picks they would be awarded.

$2.562 million - First- and third-round

$2.017 million - First-round

$1.417 million - Second-round

$927,000 - Nothing because Moore was undrafted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers will slap the 2nd round tag on him.. if someone offer's him a contract, the Panthers will match. More than likely, they want to see him do well the first 5-6 games of the 2010 season, before they offer him a long term deal. Similar to Tony Romo in Dallas.. he came in the tail end of 06' played really well, and then got a new deal 5 games in to the 07 season, when he showed it was no fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers will slap the 2nd round tag on him.. if someone offer's him a contract, the Panthers will match. More than likely, they want to see him do well the first 5-6 games of the 2010 season, before they offer him a long term deal. Similar to Tony Romo in Dallas.. he came in the tail end of 06' played really well, and then got a new deal 5 games in to the 07 season, when he showed it was no fluke.

They won't do that because it'll allow another team to dictate terms of the deal. Poison pills suck. They'll try to negotiate a long term deal for moderate salaries with escalators if he starts a certain number of games or achieves certain incentives just like what they did with Weinke. If we do offer the RFA tender, it'll be with the intention of letting him go for the draft picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we do offer the RFA tender, it'll be with the intention of letting him go for the draft picks.

Which will be the single decision that will make me more livid than any other since we traded for Sean Gilbert. It will also set us back and help keep us in the laughingstock standings of NFL QB employment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which will be the single decision that will make me more livid than any other since we traded for Sean Gilbert. It will also set us back and help keep us in the laughingstock standings of NFL QB employment.

The other side of that "IF" was working the deal to keep him. I don't see it as an option to let him "test the market" because once he signs an offersheet, we're stuck with the terms or we let him go. We would be better to dictate our own terms IF our management folks see him as the QB going forward and Moore wants to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have seen little inclination that they are laying down on him, that I can agree with. I don't think we are going to ever see much in the way of unfiltered opinions in the public realm from his teammates because that's extremely rare and extremely toxic behavior.  It's certainly a positive thing that they support him but, again, that doesn't make a successful NFL starting QB. Playing well on Sunday's does.  That is what has been lacking to date. He is not playing well consistently enough to be considered an NFL starting QB. He has to improve there. Be more consistent. Be more decisive. Make correct decisions more frequently. 
    • That's fine but for every Kurt Warner there are 10 Tony Banks that don't find their spot because....it never really existed.  Jake Browning was on and off practice squad teams for years until he stuck in Cincy. In his limited action over the past two seasons, he has played well enough that the Bengals panic traded for 41 year old Joe Flacco. It's easy to point to outliers like Warner or Purdy or Tom Brady as players who fell through the cracks because....well, they are outliers. The statistics over the long term have never really borne out the argument that every QB is just waiting for their perfect spot and situation. Most of these guys bounce around the league and it just never really clicks anywhere or they become marginal backup QB's. I don't think that exactly an accident. It's tough to be a starting NFL QB and it's why the hunt every offseason is so frantic. There are just so few that do it at a high level. My guess is that a theoretical market for Bryce Young(today) is going to look a lot like that post Chicago Justin Fields market. Not a lot of interest and a late round pick value at the highest. And a lot of that IS going to be his average to below average physical traits. It's extremely tough to be in that range and excel in the NFL. And it's precisely because you DO have to be closer to perfection to make up for the fact that you can't do a lot of the things that the elite to above average starters in this league do. 
    • Im never not impressed by how confidently wrong you are. I've watched probably 200 NFL QBs play live. This talk about Bryce's arm strength is retarded, pure and simple. Bryce can make every throw an NFL QB needs to make in any circumstance. Does he have an arm that makes you go wow all the time? No, but very few QBs truly do. Bryce has plenty of zip on the ball when he wants. That TD to XL was a frozen rope. He throws to the opposite hash and outside all the time with no problem. Bryce's arm is objectively stronger than Cam's post-injury. I've seen both live multiple times and I know. And Cam could still play QB well without his rocket launcher. OPs point remains. QB success relies on a lot of nebulous things. Obviously you dont like Bryce. But his success is not going to be bc he doesn't have the arm strength. Its embarrassing this is a thing. Go to some games and actually educate yourself.  
×
×
  • Create New...