Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How can ONE injured DT change the whole season.


fitty76

Recommended Posts

Forget Delhomme for a second. Anyone notice the attitude toward the season changed once Kemoeatu got hurt? That's one guy! Look how many players have been injured for the Philadelphia Eagles.

Stewart Bradley, out for the year

Jamaal Jackson, out for the year

Shawn Andrews, out for the year

Cornelius Ingram, out for the year

Ellis Hobbs, out for the year

Omar Gaither, out for the year

Brian Westbrook, out most of the year

Kevin Curtis, out most of the year

Todd Herrimans, out 6 games

Akeem Jordan out 4 games

Joselio Hanson, out 4 games

Donovan McNabb, Desean Jackson, Jason Peters, Jeremy Maclin, etc... all missing games

Yet the Eagles are 11-4 and the Panthers are 7-8?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, Mcnabb was only out two games, and they were 1-1. Lost to New Orleans and beat a bad Kansas city team.

The problem with Kemo going out is that we knew even before Kemo went out that Dline was a weakspot for us. I will say though that the front office did a fine job replacing him. By the end of the season, I felt our dline was adequate, much better than last year. I wish Hollis Thomas was a few years younger, and could stick around for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, Mcnabb was only out two games, and they were 1-1. Lost to New Orleans and beat a bad Kansas city team.

The problem with Kemo going out is that we knew even before Kemo went out that Dline was a weakspot for us. I will say though that the front office did a fine job replacing him. By the end of the season, I felt our dline was adequate, much better than last year. I wish Hollis Thomas was a few years younger, and could stick around for a while.

I wish Ho-T was younger too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defensive injuries were not as heralded but just as disasterous.

Not only did they lose their only nt, they effectively lost hayden when they needed him to play out of position. On top of that, they went through tc and the preseason without davis, beason, and Harris while installing a new defense. It was just one more thing on top of everything else.

I've thought a lot about what was different between this year and 2004, and I think the answer is that the injuries happened all at once as opposed to spread out over the season. In 2004, it was just a really bad three week span where they lost fields and jenkins, and dan Morgan got his annual nagging injury, then remained relatively healthy.

This year, it was just something new every fuging week. They couldn't get their feet under them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We set a fuging team record for consecutive weeks with a different starting lineup. (was it an NFL record as well? not sure.) If that doesn't say something, I don't know what does.

This is all while we're installing a new defense, and experiencing the Jake fiasco. We're going to finish 8-8 or 7-9, not too shabby I'd say, especially considering nearly every game we played that we lost was close, discounting Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Chargers put their Pro Bowl Nose tackle on IR, one of 9 on IR. And are currently on a 10 game win streak.

Hell even the Aints have 14 players on IR.

both of those teams have top five qbs and elite offenses as a whole

their margins of error are much larger than a jake delhomme led panthers

on top of that, regardless of their record the saints look like rubbish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

both of those teams have top five qbs and elite offenses as a whole

their margins of error are much larger than a jake delhomme led panthers

on top of that, regardless of their record the saints look like rubbish

That is a good point.

And a good arguement why the Panthers need a Franchise QB.

Does Matt Moore fill that need?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The last child @ home has told me he wants to go to a game, so we're seeing vs Rams on the 30th
    • Did we really shut them down though? They had 369 yards of offense.   That is 9 more yards than they average per game and 53 more than we give up per game this year.   If a team gave up 369 yards per game on defense, they'd be the 7th worst defense in the league this year. Yes, I will give our defense credit for having the 4th down stand near our goal line as well as creating the fumble that stopped their first drive, as they did rise to the occasion then, but even the INT was just a ridiculous play/throw and handed it to us and they also missed a FG. We didn't force them into a single punt all game.  We had 1 sack on a QB who had 37 pass attempts. They had drives of 56, 49, 50, 43, 58, and 71 yards (while we only had 2 over 40 yards ourselves). We bent, a lot, but never really broke, partially due to the Packers own mistakes, that's a far cry from "shutting them down" in my opinion.  Again, this is why I'm critical of us after a day like today, I'm able to look beyond a final score and evaluate how we played on the whole, and we keep squeaking out these wins despite not playing well at all.  And yes, that is what great teams do, but they also play well in the majority of their games, where as all we seem to do is squeak out ugly wins without ever playing all that well. I'm not saying I'm unhappy that we won, I've never once said anything like that, but when week after week I see serious concerns with how we played, then I'm going to call out what I see.
    • Washington is going to have to do better than this
×
×
  • Create New...