Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smith to IR,Mortty Ivy signed


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

It only means we intend on running the ball down the Saint's throat, and if that doesn't work, maybe dumping off some more screens than normal to our RB's, and more use of our TE's in the passing game.

Moose and Jarrett, and I expect to see Kenny Moore used more. Don't know much about the Charly Martin kid, he only has 1 reception for 6 yards this year, and that was against Tampa.

We'll be fine. :cheers2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we need to be throwing it out of the backfield and to the tight ends as well as run if we are going to win.They will be blitzing and doubling Moose all night. Jarrett, Moore, and Martin are going to have step up to the plate. If no one shows, then we know where our biggest need lies. Still with Moore being the number 2 the first half of the year, he should be familiar with these guys and what they can do. He really needs to get it to Rosario and Barnidge which will open things up between the tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this means we will finally see Goodson more in the slot. I want to give him a couple shots deep and see what he can do.

Moore is your best option on the deep ball from what I've seen so far. Goodson in the slot...maybe, but I like more all the way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore is your best option on the deep ball from what I've seen so far. Goodson in the slot...maybe, but I like more all the way around.

I think Goodson is faster and is actually a really good reciever (I actually think he fits in much better at Slot Reciever then RB in our offense). I have no idea why they haven't used him as the 3rd receiver more. He reminds me of Golden Tate when he got to ND.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...