Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Laughable Drew Brees Quote


Captroop

Recommended Posts

I don't know why you guys think Brees' comment was so offensive to the Panthers. What did you expect him to say?

It's offensive because he is trying to downplay our victory. He's saying that the only reason we won is because their starters rested. My point is that it's pretty easy to talk trash if you never have to back it up. Imagine some guy came up to you and said, "I would kick your ass, but I don't want to get a black eye before my photoshoot. Consider yourself lucky that we aren't gonna fight, cuz if we did, I would win."

I expect someone who didn't play in a game to keep his mouth shut about what he thinks the outcome would have been if he had played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's offensive because he is trying to downplay our victory. He's saying that the only reason we won is because their starters rested. My point is that it's pretty easy to talk trash if you never have to back it up. Imagine some guy came up to you and said, "I would kick your ass, but I don't want to get a black eye before my photoshoot. Consider yourself lucky that we aren't gonna fight, cuz if we did, I would win."

I expect someone who didn't play in a game to keep his mouth shut about what he thinks the outcome would have been if he had played.

well, you didn't play, nor will you ever, so do as you preach and STFU!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We're only going to score 17 points?" Brady said Wednesday morning before chuckling. "OK. Is Plax playing defense?

"I wish he had said 45-42 and gave us a little credit for more points."

Anyone else remember this quote from Brady before the superbowl? Reminds me of Brees' little quip. I wonder if Brees had the same poo eating grin Brady had on his face when he made that statement.

Players who make predictions like that are just smug douchebags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's offensive because he is trying to downplay our victory. He's saying that the only reason we won is because their starters rested. My point is that it's pretty easy to talk trash if you never have to back it up. Imagine some guy came up to you and said, "I would kick your ass, but I don't want to get a black eye before my photoshoot. Consider yourself lucky that we aren't gonna fight, cuz if we did, I would win."

I expect someone who didn't play in a game to keep his mouth shut about what he thinks the outcome would have been if he had played.

Ummmmm, that's because it is the only reason the Panthers won? Seems to me that it was a double digit win for the Saints when both teams played at relative full strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummmmm, that's because it is the only reason the Panthers won? Seems to me that it was a double digit win for the Saints when both teams played at relative full strength.

Yes, back before the Saints caught the suck. There's no denying you got the suck now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...