Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Na'ill Diggs extended


AceMan

Recommended Posts

http://www.heraldonline.com/247/story/1849125.html

CHARLOTTE -- The Panthers apparently have decided to hang onto linebacker Na'il Diggs and have adjusted his contract accordingly.

The linebacker was scheduled to make $2 million in 2010, and that was to be the final year of his deal. He's now slated to make $855,000 in 2010, and another four years have been tacked onto the back side.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was kind of thinking that with the way Anderson played this season that they may get rid of Diggs... guess not. Fox/Hurney like the vets for sure.

dunno about anderson playing strong side. either way, diggs probably won't last out his contract, they're just covering their bases in case they lose guys this year. we very well could lose anderson this year depending on the tender we put on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was kind of thinking that with the way Anderson played this season that they may get rid of Diggs... guess not. Fox/Hurney like the vets for sure.

Capable experienced starter for <$1mil is a damn fine deal, he can't be on much more than the min for a vet his age. You don't just chuck away talent if its still useful.

Question is how big the signing bonus is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, no I’m not going to panic when he got 2 Qs and looked great in 1 and looked not great in another (let’s not mention the drop).    Yeah we finally have a team that would be considered average offensively around him. Let’s roll this season. 
    • The woe is me everything but Bryce sucks mantra is stale af my friend. Look nobody here is going to argue with the fact Frank Reich was not a good head coach. At the same time. Bryce Young is now in his second season with his second coaching staff and a handpicked young offensive head coach who has been known for working with QB's such as Baker and Geno. As far as the offensive pieces around Bryce we have the 4th highest salary cap allocation (that might be even higher now after the new Moton deal) dedicated to the OL in the entire league. We have 2 first round WR's one of them 8th overall the first time we've ever selected a WR that high in franchise history. And the fact of the matter is Bryce Young did not have a good preseason. It's not the first time it's happened either. We all hope to see he and the rest of the team flip a switch in week 1. But we should all be able to agree that the offensive performances we've seen from the entire QB room (Bryce included) in preseason was simply unacceptable.
    • We have seen Bryce play… what… 9 games with AT BEST what one would consider NFL average WRs? You just can’t see the forest for the trees and keep going back to your lazy take of revisionist history.    he looked AWFUL Y1 with the worst coaching I’ve ever seen in the NFL and one of the weakest WR rooms I can recall. He looked awful first half of y2 and great second half of y2 with average coaching and average skill position. I don’t know where this elite talent argument even comes from. 
×
×
  • Create New...