Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023-24 Regular Season(non canes) thread


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Not a lot to pick from today, I usually do parlays on days when there are 8+ games spaced out...  but today I'm definitely taking the Canes -1.5 Blues on the moneyline and the Knights at -1.5

Are you still adding Necas for shots? He’s been solid for me at the 3+ shot mark so far.
 

I should be adding Skjei at 2+ as he tends to be our blue liner with the most shots on goal, burns tends to get everything tipped or deflected. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Are you still adding Necas for shots? He’s been solid for me at the 3+ shot mark so far.
 

I should be adding Skjei at 2+ as he tends to be our blue liner with the most shots on goal, burns tends to get everything tipped or deflected. 

I've left hin off lately because he's only hit over 2.5 one time in the last 5.... and I'm not comfortable betting under with him. I've been adding 1pt (either assist or goal) for Aho and Guentzel 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Are you still adding Necas for shots? He’s been solid for me at the 3+ shot mark so far.
 

I should be adding Skjei at 2+ as he tends to be our blue liner with the most shots on goal, burns tends to get everything tipped or deflected. 

Also just a heads up I win about 40% of my parlays I tend to hedge bet the game I am least comfortable about, the one I lost yesterday was an example of that, even with that said I've been pulling about 250% profit from my bets pretty consistently.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On tap tonight.

Habs @ Red Wings

Isles @ Devils

Preds @ Pens

Bruins @ Caps

Ottawa @ Rags

 

If Ottawa wins in any fashion we take the wheel for metro and presidents. If the Red Wings and Pens lose it doesn’t matter what happens in the bruins caps. Capitals would still be in the driver seat for WC2. If the Isles win they clinch M3.
 

So it’s quite possible we’ll know who are first round opponent is if the rags and isles win. 

 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know how the NBA does it but I’m not a fan of the idea unless the playoffs and league are expanded. As they state in the video the East is basically a play in tourney right now. 
 

Only way I’m cool with it is if the league and playoffs are expanded and there is some kind of points limit. Example: If the bottom play in team is like 10 points back then it just auto seeds the 9th playoff spot. Regular season should matter.

Knowing that, you can bet Bettman is trying to figure out how to generate the revenue from it right now.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harbingers said:

I don’t know how the NBA does it but I’m not a fan of the idea unless the playoffs and league are expanded. As they state in the video the East is basically a play in tourney right now. 
 

Only way I’m cool with it is if the league and playoffs are expanded and there is some kind of points limit. Example: If the bottom play in team is like 10 points back then it just auto seeds the 9th playoff spot. Regular season should matter.

Knowing that, you can bet Bettman is trying to figure out how to generate the revenue from it right now.. 

Adding even more games to the NHL playoffs is nuts. The NHL off-season will soon be 6 weeks.

Now, if the NHL does expand, they also need to realign the divisions to 4 divisions. Once that is done, lose the wildcard and just go with top 2 per division. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...