Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joshua Cribbs


Lt Pinkerton

Recommended Posts

11/3/2006: Signed a six-year, $6.77 million contract extension through 2012. The deal included a $2 million signing bonus. Another $400,000 is available through yearly incentives. He can also earn $25,000 workout bonuses in each year. 2009: $620,000, 2010: $635,000, 2011: $650,000, 2012: $790,000, 2013: Free Agent

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/clubhouse_contracts.aspx?sport=NFL&majteam=CLE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he is an interesting player with a lot of upside. he hasn't proven he can be number 1 guy, but he has shown time and time again that he is a big play threat and can take it to the house any play. actually, he reminds me of a younger, underdeveloped steve smith. worth a look.

Yeah, he'll be a FA... in 2013.

last I heard, he was requesting a trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely. The man is a beast on special teams, and with a competent offense, he could really be special. Not sure if the Steve Smith comparisons are apt, especially because he ususally carries out of the backfield, leading me to believe they don't trust his hands in Cleveland.

Would love to pick him up.

And RockNRolla, isn't possible they signed him with the intention of trading him for picks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He really hasn't shown he can be a 2 or 3.

We wont be trading for a returner.

considering Steve Smith was our last legit threat at returner......I'm ready for Fox to bring in someone legit. Our guys clearly don't have an eye for a threat and opt for sufficient option each year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...