Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sign T.O. as a #2?

Hotsauce

By Hotsauce,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

DelhommesTheMan Newbie

DelhommesTheMan

Posted
Posted

I think TO would be the perfect fit for what we need. Smitty doesnt want to be a #1 anymore. He said himself he wants the Panthers to get a legit #1 so he can stay in the slot like Welker. If the money is right, no reason this shouldnt be an option. Owens would know the situation, he would be Moss, and SMitty would be Welker, whats wrong with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claws Newbie

Claws

Posted
Posted

Think for two secs how TO would've acted with all of Jakes picks earlier this season!

He would've killed any good mojo going on! Those INTs and TO would have started some !poo instead of just riding it out like the rest of the team was able to do.

Hell no, I don't want her in a Panthers uni.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nicbsbll2 Newbie

Nicbsbll2

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't object to it. He knows we have Smitty. He knows that we have Double Trouble. He knows that he would be the number 2, number 3 if you count the running game. Like someone else said, he wasn't the problem in Buffalo so I wouldn't object to bringing him in for a year or two while we are grooming our soon to be draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Baschski Newbie

Baschski

Posted
Posted

I actually wouldn't object to this. First of all, despite his dramatic past, he wasn't a problem in Buffalo, and with the attitude that the team has here and the guys we have in the locker room, I highly doubt he would cause a problem. Secondly, we have the potential to win NOW, so his age isn't a huge detractor. We could bring him in for a year or two while our drafted receiver (Shipley, Benn, Tate maybe) develops, and he would certainly be an upgrade to our WR core.

That said, I doubt it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
guyinchesapeake Newbie

guyinchesapeake

Posted
Posted

T.O.? *#@& no!! What did this clown do this past year? I thought he was 'the missing link' in Buffalo to take them over the hump and into the playoffs? He's almost as old as Moose is, and is guaranteed to be cancer in the lockerroom to boot. If he caught 20% of the passes he dropped over the last 3 years or so, his teams might have gone somehere. We should have learned from the MeShawn Johnson debacle, we let a proven winner like Ricky Proehl go to accomodate that overrated, useless bag of wind. let's not let history repeat itself..

Again, *#@& no to T.O....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

so if T.O. and moose asked for the same $ and same contract length, who do you take?

Exactly. People are thinking about Jarrett (who I believe will be here), but I am more concerned with how we could justify keeping Moose if we were able to acquire TO. We wouldn't keep them both would we?

Sorry, Moose, I love ya, but TO is the bigger threat, and could actually spread the defense (j/k....).

Double Trouble x2. The Quad Squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...