Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football outsiders has an in depth analysis of Jake Delhomme


Fiz

Recommended Posts

's biscuit commercial.

oh also there's some stuff about his playing career.

http://footballoutsiders.com/scramble/2010/scramble-ball-our-biscuits

Mike: Truly, Jake Delhomme is living the dream. Except for that whole being put on IR in disgrace thing.

Tom: Remember, it's not Jake's fault John Fox signed him to a crazy extension. If I were in his shoes, I would have signed the same deal.

Mike: Of course.

Tom: Nor is it strictly Delhomme's fault Fox kept trotting him out there after it was reasonably clear Delhomme was not a good option.

Mike: I'm really wondering what happened to him. Maybe too many biscuits? Or too tired after a night of stalking the town, protecting women from inferior baked goods?

Tom: He's 34, and NFL quarterbacks tend to decline as they age. Guys like Warren Moon or Don Lorenzo are serious, serious exceptions to the general trend of NFL quarterbacks. Almost no quarterbacks are good after the age 36 or so, and that includes elite, Hall of Fame-caliber players. Delhomme had a shorter distance to fall, so maybe we shouldn't be surprised that he declined slightly early.

Mike: Wait, is this actual football analysis in our commercial segment? DARK ARTS.

I've never really liked Football Outsider's hand waving about Delhomme just getting old and that being that.

Traditionally, when people talk about the age of a QB, they're actually referring to the number of snaps, throws, and hits the QB has taken in an NFL game. With modern medicine and training regimens the way they are, physical deterioration isn't such a problem as it was just a decade ago. These guys are in a physical form that most humans never reach.

Their stats of delhomme match their statistical model of QB regression, but it doesn't take into consideration that Jake Delhomme was 29 when he started for the Panthers, only had a handful of NFL starts before that, and the average QB who started in his second year in the league had 6 years more under his belt.

Adding further evidence that Jake Delhomme's problems are strictly between the ears and not physical is his performance last year, namely against Detroit and Oakland. In those games, Jake was as bad as he would be in 2009 and against Arizona in the playoffs. He looked strikingly similar, actually. Deep balls floated on him, out routes were jumped, crossing routes were airmailed, basically everything we saw this year. His footwork completely broke down as well.

He didn't physically regress just in those two games. The same guy who imploded didn't then physically resurge at the end of the season.

It's clearly mental and I wish the media would just point that out but oh well whatever i didn't mean for this post to be this long here's a funny gif of titans owner bud adams flipping off everything he sees

budadamsmiddlefinger.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

of course it is mental, no doubt about it. You play golf Fiz? Jake basically has the yips....all between his ears. Throws a floater when he should throw a bullet, throws a bullet when he should throw a floater, when things start going bad they just start snowballing on him...yips my friend, yips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didn't mean for this post to be this long here's a funny gif of titans owner bud adams flipping off everything he sees

What's this? Self-depricating humor? Fiz actually considering the feeling of other Huddlers to the point that he actually does something nice for us (funny gif for our amusement)? Is this the dawn of a kinder gentler Fiz, or the quiet before the storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The yips has killed the career of many a golfer or big league pitcher. A few pro quarterbacks, too. If you look at how he went south so quick and so completely, it can't be anything but the yips.

Self-doubt, in anything, can be a killer. And traditionally, the only way to cure the yips is to play through it. But sometimes, with the pressure constantly on, there's no way to break through the wall. I believe Fox was trying to give him every chance to play through it, but it just wouldn't happen.

Maybe a year on the bench as a second stringer will do it. Perhaps his want will exceed his fear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...