Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL VP of Officiating admits the refs missed a key call in NFC Championship game


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

The Vikings got a lot of calls... So no, I'm not joking. Saints didn't get 4 or 5 cheap shots. If you feel that way, then we will have to just disagree. The QB is allowed to get hit. Apparently, the Vikings are allowed to take cheap shots as well? As Brees was hit in the very situation Favre was. Both happened in back to back sets of downs. Favre got the call, Brees didn't. Both plays were end-arounds.

Yes, the Saints player deserves to get fined for the knee thing, but if you expect the guy to stop playing- you're insane. People are so easily caught up in this new NFL rule that they forget the defensive players can't do anything to play the game anymore.

The fine is deserved. But it was not a cheap shot. He isn't going to stop until the whistle is blown. Any player to quit on a play is a player I do not want. The RT shouldn't be allowed to put the defensive player in a position where he is at knee level.. Make it fair. The guy didn't line up and aim at Favre's knee. He was put to the ground and kept playing, getting after the QB. It's unfortunate that he was only able to make a play that happened to be at knee level. So I completely disagree with your assessment about a cheap shot.

I don't know about you all... but I want my defense putting licks on the QB every play. That is crucial to a good defense...

The Saints got a lot of penalties, and not all were deserved... The Refs also missed a lot of calls that would have went in the Saints favor. I disagree that any missed calls were an excuse after that being said.

Here, dude:

nerd_glasses.jpg

The refs may have missed call one way, but they missed probably 4 to 6 going the other way---four of which were missed on the game winning drive (which may have included a pass rusher being blocked from behind on the throw and catch that really wasn't a catch IMO). To have so many missed, err bad, calls on the final drive going one way is just a tad irregular in my estimation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for real.. I stated there were missed calls. Vikings got a few calls in their favor and a few were missed in their favor.

To say the Saints were putting on cheap shots is where I take issue. And also, my point is that the missed calls on that last drive shouldn't have changed the outcome considering the Vikings had their moments which make up for it...

I am really taking an interest in the cheap shot statements... I think that word is easy to use more so than true..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...