Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Mock Drafts


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

it's funny how you go through phases (or at least i do) where i see this one guy and think "he really needs to be here" so he shows up consistently in mocks. i'm leaning that way with Pearsall. There's quite a few WRs i like and would be great with them coming here, but for about a week now Pearsall is that guy for me. I want us to double dip (at least) at WR and i don't really care which one it is that we pair with him, as long as we can manage to get him.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Martin said:

I would do Sweat instead of Wilson, but otherwise close to the ideal draft. I like the idea of Limmer getting a year or two behind Corbett and then taking over.

i hope Corbett can stay upright long enough and that he's good at the center thing. Limmer is one i wouldn't hate at OC. I think we've got a few decent options spread out through the draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

it's funny how you go through phases (or at least i do) where i see this one guy and think "he really needs to be here" so he shows up consistently in mocks. i'm leaning that way with Pearsall. There's quite a few WRs i like and would be great with them coming here, but for about a week now Pearsall is that guy for me. I want us to double dip (at least) at WR and i don't really care which one it is that we pair with him, as long as we can manage to get him.

I was all about JPJ at C for us (would still be my #1 pick, but I don’t think he’ll be there). But now I’m all about Sweat. Would make our D-Line amazing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Martin said:

I was all about JPJ at C for us (would still be my #1 pick, but I don’t think he’ll be there). But now I’m all about Sweat. Would make our D-Line amazing. 

that's kind of where my head is at now...the idea of Sweat on there with Robinson and Brown is just too awesome an idea.

and then you've got Clowney coming off the edge...yow!

i don't care who you put on the other side, damage would be done.  OLs won't be able to deal with a front 3 like that. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rayzor said:

i hope Corbett can stay upright long enough and that he's good at the center thing. Limmer is one i wouldn't hate at OC. I think we've got a few decent options spread out through the draft. 

That's a dangerous gamble imo.  He's had very significant lower body injuries 2 seasons in a row and is an unknown at center. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

That's a dangerous gamble imo.  He's had very significant lower body injuries 2 seasons in a row and is an unknown at center. 

i don't like our chances when we gamble with poo like that.

as seriously as we have taken getting the interior OL right this year, you'd think we would take center more seriously. i have to imagine that we will be addressing it in the draft unless there's some OC FA gem they are waiting to hear about.

Could be we will try to draft one and if not then we'll look into some other FA options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Martin said:

I would do Sweat instead of Wilson, but otherwise close to the ideal draft. I like the idea of Limmer getting a year or two behind Corbett and then taking over.

I put Wilson there because I got a feeling that's what the Panthers will do at 39.  I've been on Wilson since Morgan was hired, he's a former ILB and I feel he wants to make his stamp there like Ron did with Kuechly. When Kuechly put his stamp of approval on him it all but sealed it for me.  I think his value is in the 3rd but he won't make it that long so I can see them picking him at 39.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

three recents. i'd be cool with any mix and matching of these three. leaning more on the AD/Pearsall combo than AD/McConkey... seems like getting similar players while allowing for another roster upgrade at the 39ish pick. Isaac, Sweat and Tampa could all come in and have an immediate impact on next year's team

PFN_Draft_result_1711638671857.thumb.png.b57a179ca0a8ec24ddff48ad522e651d.pngPFN_Draft_result_1711667626067.thumb.png.5e339e4574d747701cf6bea2d5144365.pngPFN_Draft_result_1711668548684.thumb.png.60af1c8ae9a76f1473fbd1b2946469be.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...