Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Rangers 7pm

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Sorry, I was talking about Kochetkov's improvement being the result of consistent playing time.

I think our goalie situation is what it is unless Freddie comes back. Barring a TDL move that would require Carolina giving up a major player just for a #2 goalie, I'm afraid that what we see is what we get in net the remainder of the year.

There is no availability goalie that isn’t going to cost 200+% of what they normally would in a trade. We are not the only team that is having goalie issues, in fact quite a few contenders are.  There are only 2-3 teams sitting on legit goalie capital currently from what some of the hockey talk shows have said too. So it’s a wait and see who’s willing to give how much by the deadline. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

There is no availability goalie that isn’t going to cost 200+% of what they normally would in a trade. We are not the only team that is having goalie issues, in fact quite a few contenders are.  There are only 2-3 teams sitting on legit goalie capital currently from what some of the hockey talk shows have said too. So it’s a wait and see who’s willing to give how much by the deadline. 

I think our goalie issue is solved with Koochie. He has it stabilized. Now just need raanta to play about 3-4 more times until Freddie comes back. Freddie will slide  in a at 2 and raanta will be the heathy scratch.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Harbingers said:

There is no availability goalie that isn’t going to cost 200+% of what they normally would in a trade. We are not the only team that is having goalie issues, in fact quite a few contenders are.  There are only 2-3 teams sitting on legit goalie capital currently from what some of the hockey talk shows have said too. So it’s a wait and see who’s willing to give how much by the deadline. 

There was an article on this a couple weeks ago. If you want a goalie you are going to have to pay out the ass for him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Tomcatn
      Evero HC requests!

      By Tomcatn · Posted

      getting rid of Evero is like trying to flick a sticky booger off of your finger
    • MHS831
      Very intrigued how Morgan and Canales handle the offseason

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I think signing Coker long term now (since you are not signing Ickey) makes sense, based on his production numbers.  If he balls out next year, you could be looking in the $15m range for a player you could have much cheaper.  If you wait until you have to make decisions about a healthy Ickey and then QB, you could lose Coker.  (I have not looked at contract details etc. so my math could be off--but where I sit now, it seems to me this is obvious:  Coker seems to have a future--solid hands, can get open, etc. His production (less that 400 yards) is probably far less than he will have next year etc.)
    • Davidson Deac II
      2025 College Football Thread

      By Davidson Deac II · Posted

      I completely disagree.  If one is 20 years old and doesn't have the sense to understand what a contract is, shouldn't be signing them. And from what I understand, these guys have agents advising them.   Once the contract is signed, both the school and the individual signing should be bound by it as long as it follows the law.  Otherwise, what is the point of the contract?
×
×
  • Create New...