Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IW loses Call of Duty

Acewalker

By Acewalker,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

bredy087 Newbie

bredy087

Posted
Posted

IW screwed up COD for the PC! PC is what made COD famous. You can't alienate a large and loyal base and think everything is gonna be ok. Ive been playing COD since the very first one and let me tell you MW2 was retarded...great graphics, fun story....RUINED by multiplayer. There hasn't been that much hacking in game since Counter Strike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugor Hill Collaborator

Hugor Hill

Posted
Posted

IW screwed up COD for the PC! PC is what made COD famous.

Agreed! the NO Dedicated server fiasco really ruined MW2 for me. I have to have a computer find a server match for me, like I cant do that myself. And then I have to wait 20 minutes for it to find one, and then when I get on there's hackers everywhere and VAC cant ban them. There are no admins, people are admitting they are hacking and IW nor Steam will do anything about it. They said "VAC will take care of it, DO NOT SEND US anymore complaints/videos/screenshots of potential hackers" I see about 4-5 hackers a night, and I cant quit cause if I do I lose all my XP points for that match. Its stupid. [/rant]

Cod:UO is still the BEST COD PC game out there IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...