Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thursday RFA Tenders

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

Adam_Schefter:

Filed to ESPN: Redskins placed first-round tender on QB Jason Campbell. Tender is 110 percent of last year's base salary, over $3.1 million.

I have a feeling this list is going to get long, so to save space, if you come across one, just add it.

Redskins put the second-round tender on LB Rocky McIntosh, a former second-round pick.

Filed to ESPN: Broncos tendered Pro Bowl LB Elvis Dumervil at a first- and third-round level. The tender carries a $3.168 million pricetag

Dolphins placed first-round tender on RB Ronnie Brown. Tender is 110 percent of last year's salary, which comes out to $3.969 million.

RT @AlvinKeels The Jets have decided to place the 2nd rounder tender on client Leon Washington.

Vikings tendered postseason standout DE Ray Edwards at the first-round level
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherfan81 Newbie

pantherfan81

Posted
Posted

The Colts placed the first-round tender on safety Antoine Bethea, according to a source close to the situation.

Should any team sign Bethea to an offer sheet, the Colts will have seven days to match -- or get back the other team's first-round pick.

Bethea is a former sixth-round pick who was selected to the Pro Bowl last season. The first-round tender is worth $2.521 million.

The Baltimore Ravens placed the first-round tender on offensive tackle Jared Gaither and fullback Le'Ron McClain, according to sources.

The price for the first-round tender for both players is $2,396,000.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4962518

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...