Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question about RFA'S


panther4life

Recommended Posts

This may be a dumb question so i apoligize in advance if so but say a team signs a restricted free agent...i'll use richard marshall as an example, if he gets signed by another team for what year will we get the 2nd rd pick, for the 2011 draft?? surely not this years draft right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be a dumb question so i apoligize in advance if so but say a team signs a restricted free agent...i'll use richard marshall as an example, if he gets signed by another team for what year will we get the 2nd rd pick, for the 2011 draft?? surely not this years draft right??

teams have to give up 2010 picks for RFAs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:confused:

Other, smaller leagues are going to look very attractive if they don't hammer out a new CBA.

It'll be like when Herschel Walker and doug Flutie decided to enter the USFL draft instead of the NFL draft.

Great job fuging that league up, guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, could teams opt to agree to tenders involving future draft picks beyond 2011(not sure on that myself)? For instance, using the Marshall example, could Team A offer his tender and we accept only if the pick given is round 2 2012?

If not, then it's for next year with or without a lockout.

If a team has an interest in an RFA and has a deal worked out in principle, they do have the option to go to the team that tendered the player and work out a deal (ie, when Schaub went to Houston, the Texans approached the Falcons and the teams agreed to a deal that sent Schaub to HOU for 2nd round picks that year and the next)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone tenders Marshall and we flat out agree to not match the offer, we get their second round pick in April's draft... Compensation for losing a RFA is made in this year's draft, not another year...

In Fiz's original post, I think he meant 2011...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To finish this thread...

If Marshall gets an offer and we do not match it, we get that team's second rounder in April.

Sure, we could then match the offer and agree to trade Marshall to that team for further compensation, but that would be a sign and trade, and not an RFA (Marshall) leaving because of RFA tender rules.

There will be a draft in 2011, even if there isn't NFL football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...