Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler: Cutting Delhomme was a mistake

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Carolina Panthers

Do you Agree w/ Scott Fowler  

86 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you Agree w/ Scott Fowler

    • yes
      10
    • no
      54
    • he needs pie
      22

Recommended Posts

Dpantherman Apprentice

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

Wow. Talk about a blindside hit on the quarterback.

The Carolina Panthers’ move to release veteran quarterback Jake Delhomme Thursday night was a stunner (see the story here).

I know Delhomme would have cost a lot of money to retain. I know he had his worst season ever in 2009 after getting a huge contract extension. But I still believe the Panthers just made a big mistake.

The Panthers can spin this one all they like – and certainly they will. That it was a difficult decision but it had to be made for financial reasons. That they love Jake and they didn’t want to do it, but that they simply had to because of the young nucleus of players that is going to be clamoring for contract extensions soon.

But you know what? This decision really didn’t have to be made. Not now. The NFL just entered new territory – a 2010 season with no salary cap. Any “salary-cap reasons” for this move are utterly hypothetical, because right now there is no salary cap.

No, I don’t necessarily think Delhomme should have started in 2010. But are the Panthers really ready to hand the keys to the offense over to Matt Moore on a permanent basis?

Panther head coach John Fox did everything he could possibly think of to keep Moore out of the starting lineup last season until Delhomme’s broken finger finally forced Fox’s hand and Moore went 4-1 as a starter.

So now, suddenly, Moore is the savior? Hey, maybe he is. But what if Moore gets hurt? Who plays then? (This obviously means the Panthers are going to have to sign another QB or, more likely, draft one).

I’m all for the Panthers keeping Moore. The high “tender” they placed on him this week was a good move that will just about guarantee the restricted free agent will still be a Panther in 2010.

But Delhomme, 35, should have been kept around as the ultimate, gold-plated insurance policy. We all know how great a leader he is in the locker room. We all know how smart he is and what he means to the franchise. You don’t fire a guy like that if you don’t have to.

This dismissal will please a certain faction of Panther fans, of course. The “Jake haters,” as they came to be known, have wanted Delhomme to be benched or fired for years.

But until calendar year 2009 -- which Delhomme began with an awful six-turnover game against Arizona from which he never recovered – No.17 was the best quarterback in Panther history. He won five playoff games here. He had a dozen game-winning drives in the final two minutes or in overtime. He would have been the MVP of the 2003 season’s Super Bowl had Carolina’s defense been able to stop Tom Brady.

This reminds me a lot of another March day, when Carolina coach George Seifert abruptly released Steve Beuerlein in 2001. That was an even more ridiculous decision, because Seifert picked Jeff Lewis over Beuerlein.

Moore is a lot better than Lewis. But I’m still wondering why you would do this.

Carolina has done it now, though. Delhomme is gone – and a part of all that loyalty claptrap the Panthers talk about constantly just walked out the door with him.

http://scottfowlerobs.blogspot.com/2010/03/releasing-jake-was-big-mistake.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CLTPanther Contributor

CLTPanther

Posted
Posted

I agree with cutting Delhomme. The biggest mistake was guaranteeing that 20mil. I'm grateful for what he did for us over the last 7 years, but it's time to move on. Actually it was time to move on this time last year, but we all know how that went.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Fowler is exactly right. The Panthers could have waited for this decision until after camp with no consequence. Plus his money is guaranteed so he gets paid regardless of whether he plays If the FO was worried about future cap hits they would have given Jake the 10 million signing bonus which would have voided his future payments and made everything count this year when there is no cap. They would have had his services if Moore gets hurt and an opportunity for Jake to mentor Moore this year. It would have cost nothing more and indeed give us insurance given the last time we had a quarterback finish the whole year was 2005 and Moore has had his issues with injury as well. It would have given us an opportunity to see if Moore is the real deal and whether Jake was through. Next year if there was a lockout there would be no financial consequence where now there is. Plus if we reach a CBA agreement next year we have our first rounder back which is a perfect time to draft a QB high. Unless Hurney gives our picks away again to reach into the first yet again, we won't find a starter in the draft if Moore gets hurt.

If you take the emotion out of the decision, it didn't make sense financially or football wise. I don't agree with Fowler or a lot but for once he got it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dpantherman Apprentice

Dpantherman

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Fowler is exactly right. The Panthers could have waited for this decision until after camp with no consequence. Plus his money is guaranteed so he gets paid regardless of whether he plays If the FO was worried about future cap hits they would have given Jake the 10 million signing bonus which would have voided his future payments and made everything count this year when there is no cap. They would have had his services if Moore gets hurt and an opportunity for Jake to mentor Moore this year. It would have cost nothing more and indeed give us insurance given the last time we had a quarterback finish the whole year was 2005 and Moore has had his issues with injury as well. It would have given us an opportunity to see if Moore is the real deal and whether Jake was through. Next year if there was a lockout there would be no financial consequence where now there is. Plus if we reach a CBA agreement next year we have our first rounder back which is a perfect time to draft a QB high. Unless Hurney gives our picks away again to reach into the first yet again, we won't find a starter in the draft if Moore gets hurt.

If you take the emotion out of the decision, it didn't make sense financially or football wise. I don't agree with Fowler or a lot but for once he got it right.

Sorry, but thats just football. Why wait if we were going to do it anyway. They obviously made the decision to give the keys to Moore. So no need p**sy footing around w/ a QB that we have no intention on keeping. time to move on to a new era. nice story, but this is business

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Squirrel Collaborator

Squirrel

Posted
Posted

Fowler is exactly right. The Panthers could have waited for this decision until after camp with no consequence. Plus his money is guaranteed so he gets paid regardless of whether he plays If the FO was worried about future cap hits they would have given Jake the 10 million signing bonus which would have voided his future payments and made everything count this year when there is no cap. They would have had his services if Moore gets hurt and an opportunity for Jake to mentor Moore this year. It would have cost nothing more and indeed give us insurance given the last time we had a quarterback finish the whole year was 2005 and Moore has had his issues with injury as well. It would have given us an opportunity to see if Moore is the real deal and whether Jake was through. Next year if there was a lockout there would be no financial consequence where now there is. Plus if we reach a CBA agreement next year we have our first rounder back which is a perfect time to draft a QB high. Unless Hurney gives our picks away again to reach into the first yet again, we won't find a starter in the draft if Moore gets hurt.

If you take the emotion out of the decision, it didn't make sense financially or football wise. I don't agree with Fowler or a lot but for once he got it right.

Bu they did do Jake a favor by cutting him now. Cutting him after TC and he would have a hard time finding a team. Cutting him know gives Jake the best chance of getting on a team and getting a good contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • GamecockSmitty4
      Post Draft Luke and JJ Podcast

      By GamecockSmitty4 · Posted

      Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • hepcat
      NHL 2026 Playoff Thread

      By hepcat · Posted

      Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
    • TLGPanthersFan
      NHL 2026 Playoff Thread

      By TLGPanthersFan · Posted

      Nothing about the Flyers scare me. They are a mid team that just barely made the playoffs. 
×
×
  • Create New...