Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther's Moving Toward Future


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine from Charlotte just called and asked me what I thought about the “fire sale’’ the Panthers are having today.

I’m going to tell you the same thing I told him. This is not a fire sale. Call the release of Jake Delhomme, Maake Kemoeatu, Damione Lewis, Na’il Diggs and Landon Johnson and the fact Julius Peppers and (maybe) Muhsin Muhammad are walking out the door as free agents a lot of things. But don’t call it a fire sale.

A true fire sale is when you’re getting rid of good players in their prime. Aside from Peppers, none of these guys is in his prime. Delhomme was old and, after his dismal play last season, this decision shouldn’t seem as shocking as many are making it out to be. Muhammad’s also old, but I’m not totally ruling out the possibility of him re-signing with the Panthers.

Kemoeatu, Lewis, Diggs and Johnson? They were role players, who were at the back end of their contracts. They were due salaries that were higher than their actual value.

The Panthers still have their core -- Jon Beason, Thomas Davis, Jordan Gross, Chris Gamble, Steve Smith, Jonathan Stewart and DeAngelo Williams in place -- and that’s not a bad core to work with. Besides, some of those guys are coming up on long-term contracts.

If the Panthers start getting rid of those guys, then you’ve got a real fire sale on your hands. But these were pretty basic football decisions (although the Peppers situation was much more complicated). The Panthers have some young guys like Dan Connor, Everette Brown and Charles Johnson that they have high hopes for and that they want to get on the field.

I also believe owner Jerry Richardson has a hand in all this. In part, I think this is a message to players about the uncertain labor situation. Like many owners, Richardson, is worried about the possibility of a lockout in 2011. In an uncapped year, Richardson is slashing costs. These moves aren’t much different than what the Panthers would do in a capped year.

Richardson is showing the rest of his players the oil/water/money well, while not dry, isn’t flowing freely these days.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/8691/panthers-moving-deliberately-toward-future

Nice write-up by Pat he made some sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that it isn't just as simple as saving money where it can be saved, regardless of who is taking the blow.

Edit: This is in regards to the "Jerry Richardson" paragraph and below at the end of the quote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only beef has been the Diggs release. I know there are younger guys waiting, but he wasn't due that much money, and has won, earned, and held down his starting spot for years for a reason.

The rest of the cuts I'm ok with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only beef has been the Diggs release. I know there are younger guys waiting, but he wasn't due that much money, and has won, earned, and held down his starting spot for years for a reason.

The rest of the cuts I'm ok with.

I agree, this is the only cut that I'm not backing 100%, although I'm not disagreeing with it either. To me all of the other players cut or that have been allowed to walk haven't meet or exceeded expectations. Diggs, and Brayton as a UFA that has been allowed to walk so far, actually exceeded all expectations, at least by the fans.

I guess my biggest question would be if they were willing to let Diggs and Brayton go because of the youth behind them, why not let Hoover go as well? And why not retain Llyod and cut Kasay? I'm not saying they should now cut Kasay and Hoover but as a fan it seems to be mixed messages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have felt this way all along since hearing about all the cuts. There is a core of young talent that has been starting and now the younger guys get to show us if they can perform. I am looking forward to seeing how next season plays out, it will be interesting. The Panthers could be a better team, and I think they will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like Pat Y says in one of his other Blogs, this isn't a fire sale but this team isn't going to be competitive unless they make a few moves in FA. They have too many holes to fill with the little picks they have this year and that's even if you include them trading next years first for two picks this year.

They will have to pick up someone in FA that can contribute at WR and DE at least. If not and they don't pick up someone who can contribute this season at WR and DE in FA then you can consider this a cost cutting move for the uncapped season and consider it a wash season.

If the team performs it's a bonus as the payroll is low, if not oh well didn't put a lot of money into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...